>>14 There are four links: 書き込む前に読んでね PINKちゃんねるガイド FAQ チャット I can change one of them to link to http://deleter.bbspink.com/wiki/ What should the other three links point to?
>>15 I don't understand. Can anyone provide a translation of his request?
There are problem that any archived dat page, which did not reach to 1000 like the following thread, show the posting form that should not be displayed since it is not postable.
>>25 when a dat-ochi, past-log based thread showing, The link placed in line#41(html-soure) what provides show-newly-arrived-posts is useess. <center><a href="../test/read.cgi/erobbs/1338696338/9n-">新着レスの表示</a></center> since the thread already sent to past-log area, no one can post new message except message deletion..
then, re-displaying the kako-log notifier in line#23(html-soure) by replacing line#41 with line#23 will be the user-friendy way to notify that it's showing past-log. <div style="background-color:red;color:white;line-height:3em;margin:1px;padding:1px;">■ このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています</div>
by the way, i have a fear for the difference of cgi between bbspink and 2ch. as you make modification onto the existing CGIs so easliy for improving something, we'll get a better usability than the once. this is goot side. if your modification is made so often, they will become a highly different and incompatible software/scripts than the ones in 2ch. is there any problem to corporate with 2ch? this isn't an item of one user, but i'm worrying about your corporation to 2ch.
Read.cgi is just a dat viewer. It shouldnt actually modify the server-side logic and code. If we continue to make our own improvements to read.cgi, it should not make any compatibility problems with 2ch's read.cgi.
Bbs.cgi is the server-side code. We have to be careful when modifying bbs.cgi. It is easy to make a decision that could break compatibility with 2ch's bbs.cgi. I have no intention to break compatibility with 2ch. I want to fully cooperate with 2ch.
Who will make a final dicision on a new captcha? And when is the deadline? You and Jim said in the below posts that the current captcha system (a.k.a ReCaptcha) is going to be replaced with an easier one because it is too difficult.