>>229 Back in the days I was on stateside. One day I've been to a local restaurant. It was a shocking experience to hear waitress says it's what I've ordered beside a whole four chicken leg in a bowl around a pool big, with volcano potato about to set off.
swimming in the pool filled by demiglace sauce, I repeatedly asked myself was it a fair deal. though I 've never read study on obecitical relationships between human and chicken, but I knew there is. huge thick legs should've served as the only transportation for his fat body. the dish was only quarter finished at this point, while the volcano left untouched. wait. wthat's that waitres taking to me? yes. the salad --in a sink, with bunch of cheeeeese, of course. hold on, my stomach, no, as you, were. please. I'll call the waitress, so wait --wait.
no. no. no. don't say dessert. the cake is a lie. the cake is a lie. I don't call that pink'n'green stuff a cake. I' dont call that sugarpaste a cake. Instantly I paid what I was asked for and left there without a glance.
Good evening, Jimsan. I am SHAHR of the guide. As for me, 79san became the guide in a leader. I promised with 79-san then. I "make it a deleter person in a few minutes". And one year passed. 79-san does not affect administration. Am I tame with a deleter person? I remain a guide if not tame with a deler person.
The deletion volunteer says that he or she will not open the judgment whether correspond to the kiddie porn to the public. The user asked it why. He explained saying as not saying to Mr. Jim to the user. Moreover, he says that he voluntarily goes to the police, and knows whether the act in what kind of BBS collides with the law. However, it explains that the standard etc. are said that it must not say from the manager.
It was an opinion that it was necessary to wait in mail. Declaring to the user as a manager like this is significant. What can able judgment to be it, and important showing the judgment as the manager to the user. So , user trusts volunteer's act. User can control volunteer's deviating act (guide 1b).
The snap in the going to school photograph of the woman student in Japan is included in the one with a large amount of data deleted as a kiddie porn.
You approved the deletion without showing the standard of the kiddie porn. The manager's trust so much is dangerous for the volunteer.
I am waiting for manager's statement. Clarify the deletion standard in this BBS. Is it an act that what act indicts to the police?
>>267 I did not see it, so I could not judge it. bbspink has nothing on it except words, so going to the police is not neccessary. If a volunteer did that, it was overstepping clearly. I completely understand that someone can be so moved that they feel compelled to do something like that. There are links to clearly offensive photos and videos on Pink Channel. I am disgusted sometimes as well. We are not moderated and there are so many posts daily. It is impossible to check everything.
>>268 I'm not >>267, I think it would be nice to clarify the situation.
A deleter deletes child porn photo direct link as requested in the child porn deletion request thread. Some users blame her for deleting ordinary photos instead of child porn.
The deleter wondered if she can take a look at the linked picture for checking purpose and what exactly are considered as child porn photos. She talked with local police and they said she can look at them for deletion checking purpose. Then she went over to the police with deleted linked pictures to get some advise - what kind of photos are considered to be child porn.
She said that she now know what kind of photo link she should delete, but she has no intention to disclose the exact parameter. (Because if she does so, some user may try to post borderline pictures or think of get around way)
Some user concern about their host address regulation by Fox-san for posting innocent(their belief) picture, since the deleter now asks Fox-san for regulating the repeated offender.
??? It means that you do not understand my English? if so, sorry about that. Let me know the point you do not understand. I will try different wording.
If you are asking my opinion, I would rather support the deleter's thinking. I like pinkbbs and would not like to see it vanish because of child porn matter.
I think that it would be nice to share your thought with deleters about it. Also, I think the deleter should share her founding (the exact parameter) with other deleters and with you in closed room.
削魔除=◆witch2enoc She has the problem very much. The user was made to shudder with the act on one's own authority. It is necessary to take the responsibility of this confusion.
With the kiddie porn that the Japanese thinks about The kiddie porn that Mr. JIM thinks about is a different thing.
And, the definition of the kiddie porn of having heard it from the police on which 削魔除=◆witch2enoc insists is also quite different from a Japanese sense.
Did she hear the story from the police in what country? She doesn't answer the question.
>>276 That is not kiddie porn. Maybe in some arabian countries, but not in US, or Japan. It may have other reasons to be deleted, but not for that reason. If those were my children, I would not want their images uploaded without my permission. Perhaps, the uploader did not have permission and that is why they were deleted. Either way, the deleter has no responsibility.
>>277 Do the problem to be say the candid shot? However, she insisted that this was a kiddie porn. And, the request of the access inhibit has been made.
First of all, it is necessary to define what the kiddie porn. Every range of the kiddie porn on which she insists will be very too large, and be treated as a child pornography contributor.
She assumed seeing like the kiddie porn, and deleted even general pornography.
And, the request of the access inhibit has been made as a child pornography contributor.
She is insisting that this obtains the acknowledgment of Mr. JIM. Is this true?
She is requesting the access inhibit by a very vague, and sense standard. Does Mr. JIM understand the situation?
>>278 I understand now. Yes I think that is overstepping. I told her she was doing good before, but actually I did not know what she was deleting. I never get to see the deleted stuff it is gone to fast.
And, could you suppress the communication with mail to the minimum in 削魔除=◆witch2enoc?
Could you exchange the discussion and the opinion in public appearances?
A lot of people cannot confirm it when insisting that it exchanges only with E-mail, and 削魔除=◆witch2enoc was permitted from JIM.
It only causes the individual to drive recklessly.
Her this behavior is it exactly. Even sentences without the problem Contributor's sentences are insisted on that dealings of the kiddie porn are suggested, and she has made the access prohibition request. All of the cause of the large confusion of PINK are her arbitrary decisions now. I want you to specify the standard of the kiddie porn newly presented.
In the judgment of 削魔除=◆witch2enoc, it is judged that all the people are the child pornography contributors.
I hope for Mr. JIM to understand the situation please, and to give the wise judgment.
>>280 I am not a judge or a legislator. I can not say that.
So I won't attempt to be any wiser then some of the wisest men in history. One that sat on the Supreme court of the United States said this:
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it"
I examined the meaning of his word on the site in Japan. His word seems often to be quoted in Japan by discussing pornography. Very, I thought that it was a word with deep deep emotion.
Could a wise translator see this image? In the management of this bulletin board, it thinks it is important.
In 276 linked photo. This photograph exists as not the kiddie porn but a violation of the portrait right even if it was necessary to delete the link as violations of privacy. If there are my children......(ToT
It is hoped that the image that shows the definition of the kiddie porn of Japan is translated, and the deletion standard is examined.
Thank you for correspondence in spite of a busy schedule. Please take care of yourself.
As for the definition of the kiddie porn that deviated from Japanese common sense, it might have been learnt by them that it invited ultra vires activities of * because of this confusion.
The confusion that the witch caused occurs again if the definition of some kiddie porn doesn't exist.