Let's talk with Jim-san. Part3
>>489 ワタシタチここの禁止は18歳以下か未満かもめているあるよ
491 :
Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys @Apparently admin ★:2006/09/09(土) 05:00:23 ID:???
under sounds better to me
>>489
492 :
Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys @Apparently admin ★:2006/09/09(土) 05:02:14 ID:???
>>487 You guys all know this sounds good and fun to me. I really like the idea of having
an appropriate place to fight, fence, or box.
However if we make it then we need to make rules for it too. So if we going to do this
lets talk about it after the deletion guidelines are done. What do you think?
>>484 訳
Jim-san just only looks at name and its sign, and pick one without thinking,
so it's impossible for Jim-san to think like that way.
the most important basic idea.
but it seems like that jim-san almost can not accept what he can not understand.
and he'll never understand what he has lost forever,
seems like this is his stable way policy.
I've never seen his different way of doing something.
>>485 訳
but the turely new postings which are going to make something new are posted by anonymous,
by thousands of anonymous postings.
it is rediculous that you do not learn from those postings.
for ex, people who is against ''res, sig'' don't read the articles which are written by re.sig.
they seem to be ideot to me because they just want to try to get rid of copy right.
though affection of CC lisence can not be alive without its huge possession by copy right.
it is ok to against someone.
but because he is for res.sig , it is redicurous not to read his/her opinion.
79 says
next, one moment
>>484 but I also think,
when you are talking about someone, that means you're talking about yourself.
でも、誰かのことについて話すとき、それは自分自身について語っているのである ともおもいますよ。
496 :
Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys @Apparently admin ★:2006/09/09(土) 06:28:15 ID:???
>>485 translation
If you do not accept what other people say, and just you are saying what you want to say,
that is almost like SPAMing.
it's far away from discussion or exchanging informations.
As a user, I hope that you do not think like SPAMer.