The Rules of Deletion
DEAR MASTER JIM-SAN
I'm >>168
This question may be absurd for you.
However, the volunteer and the user pay attention to this topic.
We are distinguishing between your being answering many times.
Please answer concretely about >>168.
We want to know how you are thinking of the possibility to be sued in Japan.
We request thank you.
I'm >>168
This question may be absurd for you.
However, the volunteer and the user pay attention to this topic.
We are distinguishing between your being answering many times.
Please answer concretely about >>168.
We want to know how you are thinking of the possibility to be sued in Japan.
We request thank you.
|
|
|
182 ：Jim ◆6P7QkQf8Ys ：2006/08/15(火) 17:25:38 ID:IE+YcjBt
>>181
Of course BBSPINK is only covered by US law.
The Digital Millennim copyright act of 1998
Title 2
Covers this topic, and bbspink specifically.
The deleters are not liable for anything since they are not the posters.
and I am not liable for what is posted either.
BBSPINK is simply the paper that individuals write on.
You can read the entire law here if you want.
http://www.arl.org/info/bills/dmca.pdf
Pretty boring and lots of bad parts, but Title 2 helps us much!
Of course BBSPINK is only covered by US law.
The Digital Millennim copyright act of 1998
Title 2
Covers this topic, and bbspink specifically.
The deleters are not liable for anything since they are not the posters.
and I am not liable for what is posted either.
BBSPINK is simply the paper that individuals write on.
You can read the entire law here if you want.
http://www.arl.org/info/bills/dmca.pdf
Pretty boring and lots of bad parts, but Title 2 helps us much!