日韓合作映画「サウラビ」のゆくえ
812 ：名無しさん＠お腹いっぱい。：
Saulabi suck!!!!!!!!
http://apolyton.net/forums/Forum6/HTML/000799-2.html
Warrior elite class appears Shilla prior to samurai of Japan and called Hwa-Rang
and acted under strict code named Hwa-rang-do. During the three kingdom period of Korea,
Yamato had no specilised warrior elite class. Also some suggest the ancient Korean word
"Saulabi" is the origin of Samurai. "Saul" in ancient Korean mean "fighting" and "abi"
means father or man so the word meant "fighting father" or "fighting man".
This theory becomes more probable because to Japanese the word "Samurai" has to be used
as a whole otherwise it means nothing which strongly suggest the foreign origin of the word.
Even in modern Korean, "Samu" means "fighting" but Japanese use "Kenka" or Tatakai"
as a word for fighting. "Bushi" is a word from China.
This earlier existance of warrior class in Korea and the word Saulabi and Samurai all
helps to us to reach the conclusion Samurai class in Japan actually came from Korea
and when this class was replaced by scholar class in Korea, Japan consolidated more
for this warrior class.Japanese cultural debts to Korea is not new things to say and
even McNeil,Fairbank and Reischauer know about them but lack in details.
http://apolyton.net/forums/Forum6/HTML/000799-2.html
Warrior elite class appears Shilla prior to samurai of Japan and called Hwa-Rang
and acted under strict code named Hwa-rang-do. During the three kingdom period of Korea,
Yamato had no specilised warrior elite class. Also some suggest the ancient Korean word
"Saulabi" is the origin of Samurai. "Saul" in ancient Korean mean "fighting" and "abi"
means father or man so the word meant "fighting father" or "fighting man".
This theory becomes more probable because to Japanese the word "Samurai" has to be used
as a whole otherwise it means nothing which strongly suggest the foreign origin of the word.
Even in modern Korean, "Samu" means "fighting" but Japanese use "Kenka" or Tatakai"
as a word for fighting. "Bushi" is a word from China.
This earlier existance of warrior class in Korea and the word Saulabi and Samurai all
helps to us to reach the conclusion Samurai class in Japan actually came from Korea
and when this class was replaced by scholar class in Korea, Japan consolidated more
for this warrior class.Japanese cultural debts to Korea is not new things to say and
even McNeil,Fairbank and Reischauer know about them but lack in details.
|
|
|
813 ：名無しさん＠お腹いっぱい。：2001/06/29(金) 10:02 ID:xLUxjqEA
つづき
"Tea cermony" and "Zen culture" are actually from the China and Korea also
developed these as its own called "Da-do" and "Son". So don't make too big deal
about these OK?
These Korean influence to Japanese culture are strongly supported by the evidences
of massive influx of migrants from Packje and Kokuryo(Two Korean kingdoms) Yamato
created special districts to settle these migrants in Satuma and its surrounding
regions of Kyshu and Kai,Shinao and considerable part of Kanto regions. These influx
of people to Yamato was a hugh boost towards more civilised society.
Kokuryo's territory was that of Manchuria so people are quite aggressive,tough and
full of martial spirit. Packje was a naval empire so its people are truely seafaring
ones and highly artistic and have good sense of commerce. These two Korean kingdoms
' peoples' characteristics are inherited as Today Japanese people's dual characteristics.
(while kind and peaceful but on the other hand aggressive) Actually I think there is
no point of dividing these two people(Korean & Japanese)because they share same ancestors
which Japanese bitterly deny.
Yayoi culture which is prior to Yamato too was under great influence from Korea. Bronze
culture and Rice farming introduced by the Koreans. I think that's why many Japanese
historians deny Yayoi as thier first culture.
Jomon culture is quite popular with Japanese historians and they want to see this as
thier first culture but its too primitive to be seen as civilised culture.(stone age)
I think I talked too much maybe I wanted to release my strees from the exams.
Well I don't know.
"Tea cermony" and "Zen culture" are actually from the China and Korea also
developed these as its own called "Da-do" and "Son". So don't make too big deal
about these OK?
These Korean influence to Japanese culture are strongly supported by the evidences
of massive influx of migrants from Packje and Kokuryo(Two Korean kingdoms) Yamato
created special districts to settle these migrants in Satuma and its surrounding
regions of Kyshu and Kai,Shinao and considerable part of Kanto regions. These influx
of people to Yamato was a hugh boost towards more civilised society.
Kokuryo's territory was that of Manchuria so people are quite aggressive,tough and
full of martial spirit. Packje was a naval empire so its people are truely seafaring
ones and highly artistic and have good sense of commerce. These two Korean kingdoms
' peoples' characteristics are inherited as Today Japanese people's dual characteristics.
(while kind and peaceful but on the other hand aggressive) Actually I think there is
no point of dividing these two people(Korean & Japanese)because they share same ancestors
which Japanese bitterly deny.
Yayoi culture which is prior to Yamato too was under great influence from Korea. Bronze
culture and Rice farming introduced by the Koreans. I think that's why many Japanese
historians deny Yayoi as thier first culture.
Jomon culture is quite popular with Japanese historians and they want to see this as
thier first culture but its too primitive to be seen as civilised culture.(stone age)
I think I talked too much maybe I wanted to release my strees from the exams.
Well I don't know.