十十十 正統的カトリック・スレッド 2 十十十
498 ：名無しさん＠１周年：
バーソルミュー・シュナイダー司教なんて実在しないんだよ。
バチカン大使館に問い合わせてみな。
カトリック聖職者を詐称する者を持ち出して、教線拡大を図るところは統一と一緒。
バチカン大使館に問い合わせてみな。
カトリック聖職者を詐称する者を持ち出して、教線拡大を図るところは統一と一緒。
|
|
|
499 ：名無しさん＠１周年：02/04/18 21:16
500 ：名無しさん＠１周年：02/04/18 21:17
501 ：名無しさん＠１周年：02/04/18 21:42
>>500
そうだよ。
リトル･ペブルはフィリピンの大司教と一致しているといっていた時期があったけど、教会が確認をとってみると大司教様は断固否定されていたというお話だし、
バーソロミュー・シュナイダー「司教」の件もこれと同様。
秋田の笹川シスターとの霊的一致やファチマのことも皆同じ。
そうだよ。
リトル･ペブルはフィリピンの大司教と一致しているといっていた時期があったけど、教会が確認をとってみると大司教様は断固否定されていたというお話だし、
バーソロミュー・シュナイダー「司教」の件もこれと同様。
秋田の笹川シスターとの霊的一致やファチマのことも皆同じ。
502 ：名無しさん＠１周年：02/04/18 21:45
>>500
以下参照。
Mr W Kamm .
27 September 1999.
I shall do all I can to conclude this doctrinal investigation expeditiously. However, concurrently there have
been other developments in the organisation you supervise that have drawn my attention. On 6 May 1999
you issued a press statement claiming that the Order of St Charbel had received ecclesiastical approbatio
n, a claim you repeated to me by fax on 2 June 1999. This claim was based on the actions of a Bartholome
w Schneider - designated a bishop by you on 2 June 1999- who lives in Germany. You had already written
to Archbishop Nesti, the Secretary of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life in Rome, on 7
May 1999, making the same claim of approval. Archbishop Nesti reaffirmed the Congregation's view that an
y recognition would have to be given by your diocesan bishop.
以下参照。
Mr W Kamm .
27 September 1999.
I shall do all I can to conclude this doctrinal investigation expeditiously. However, concurrently there have
been other developments in the organisation you supervise that have drawn my attention. On 6 May 1999
you issued a press statement claiming that the Order of St Charbel had received ecclesiastical approbatio
n, a claim you repeated to me by fax on 2 June 1999. This claim was based on the actions of a Bartholome
w Schneider - designated a bishop by you on 2 June 1999- who lives in Germany. You had already written
to Archbishop Nesti, the Secretary of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life in Rome, on 7
May 1999, making the same claim of approval. Archbishop Nesti reaffirmed the Congregation's view that an
y recognition would have to be given by your diocesan bishop.
503 ：名無しさん＠１周年：02/04/18 21:45
The opening of our investigation here does
not constitute such an approval. Since those dates, I have made enquiries about Bartholomew Schneider
in Germany and Spain. Both enquiries make it clear that Bartholomew Schneider is an imposter who holds
no office in the Church. This is affirmed in the correspondence of the Vicar General of Cologne diocese
to the Nuncio in Germany and to the Congregation in Rome. A warning about his illegal activities was
published in the L'Osservatore Romano on 19 September 1995. The Vicar-General of the Archdiocese
of Toledo, in a letter of 7 July 1999, denied that Bartholomew Schneider had any recognition from that
diocese. You also claimed recently (20 September 1999) that the Archbishop of Manila had "endorsed"
the organisation known as the Order of St Charbel. Cardinal Sin denied this in a letter to me on 17
September 1999 in which he stated that your claim "is a blatant abuse of the intent of the said
communication". Therefore, I ask you to: 1 Refrain from making public statements that your organisation
has been recognised by ecclesiastical authority. 2 Inform the members of your organisation of this fact,
and of the invalidity of their vows. 3 Instruct those members who have supposedly taken vows in your
institution, not to wear any semblance of a religious habit in public or to claim that they belong to an
approved Catholic institute of consecrated life.
Stop this work, to give up all association with Bartholomew Schneider and to close the so-called
Order of St Charbel for the good of souls. I have informed the Holy See of these developments
and I will publish the results of this investigation soon.
Yours sincerely
WILLIAM L MURRAY BISHOP OF WOLLONGONG.
not constitute such an approval. Since those dates, I have made enquiries about Bartholomew Schneider
in Germany and Spain. Both enquiries make it clear that Bartholomew Schneider is an imposter who holds
no office in the Church. This is affirmed in the correspondence of the Vicar General of Cologne diocese
to the Nuncio in Germany and to the Congregation in Rome. A warning about his illegal activities was
published in the L'Osservatore Romano on 19 September 1995. The Vicar-General of the Archdiocese
of Toledo, in a letter of 7 July 1999, denied that Bartholomew Schneider had any recognition from that
diocese. You also claimed recently (20 September 1999) that the Archbishop of Manila had "endorsed"
the organisation known as the Order of St Charbel. Cardinal Sin denied this in a letter to me on 17
September 1999 in which he stated that your claim "is a blatant abuse of the intent of the said
communication". Therefore, I ask you to: 1 Refrain from making public statements that your organisation
has been recognised by ecclesiastical authority. 2 Inform the members of your organisation of this fact,
and of the invalidity of their vows. 3 Instruct those members who have supposedly taken vows in your
institution, not to wear any semblance of a religious habit in public or to claim that they belong to an
approved Catholic institute of consecrated life.
Stop this work, to give up all association with Bartholomew Schneider and to close the so-called
Order of St Charbel for the good of souls. I have informed the Holy See of these developments
and I will publish the results of this investigation soon.
Yours sincerely
WILLIAM L MURRAY BISHOP OF WOLLONGONG.