科学者「西村主審は物理学的に誤審」←これでもう結論か

Stony Brook University physicist Chang Kee Jung analyzed the play frame by frame and estimated it would take 600 Newtons of force for Lovren to stop Fred's FRED forward motion.
ある学者の分析では600ニュートンの力がフレッジにかかったと推測される
The force required to cause him to fall backward, Jung said, would have been "much larger" than that.
フレッジが倒れるにはもっと大きな力が必要だ
So was Fred's fall legitimate? "Highly unlikely," says Jung.

Lynchburg College physicist Eric Goff also studied video of the 0.4 seconds in question.
After scrutinizing his "linear and angular momenta," Goff concluded that Fred's fall only could have happened if Fred had made a conscious decision to hit the dirt.
別の学者が線運動量・角運動量を調べたが故意でないと起こらない。
There's a highly scientific term for that: Fred took a dive.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/science-says-fred-flopped-1402700598