United Nations nation: a large body of people, associated with a particular territory, that is sufficiently conscious of its unity to seek or to possess a government peculiarly its own
Self defense is a human right.
CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS Article 51 Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self defense if an armed attack occurs.
United Nations nation: a large body of people, associated with a particular territory, that is sufficiently conscious of its unity to seek or to possess a government peculiarly its own
Self defense is a human right.
CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS Article 51 Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self defense if an armed attack occurs.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
United Nations nation: a large body of people, associated with a particular territory, that is sufficiently conscious of its unity to seek or to possess a government peculiarly its own
Self defense is a human right.
CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS Article 51 Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self defense if an armed attack occurs.
Each Party recognizes that an armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional provisions and processes.
Each Party recognizes that an armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional provisions and processes.
Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall be immediately reported to the Security Council of the United Nations in accordance with the provisions of Article 51 of the Charter.
Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.
>>59 The United Nations Security Council "power of veto" refers to the veto power wielded solely by the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States), enabling them to prevent the adoption of any "substantive" draft Council resolution, regardless of the level of international support for the draft.
The veto does not apply to procedural votes, which is significant in that the Security Council's permanent membership can vote against a "procedural" draft resolution, without necessarily blocking its adoption by the Council.
Each Party recognizes that an armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional provisions and processes.
Each Party recognizes that an armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional provisions and processes.
Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall be immediately reported to the Security Council of the United Nations in accordance with the provisions of Article 51 of the Charter.
Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.
下記は、国連憲章第27条に書いてある国連常任理事国である中国による拒否権発動について
The United Nations Security Council "power of veto" refers to the veto power wielded solely by the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States), enabling them to prevent the adoption of any "substantive" draft Council resolution, regardless of the level of international support for the draft.
NATO military authorities agreed in July 2001 on the principles and parameters of the ‘new’ NATO Force Structure (NFS)
Under the new concept, NATO forces should be able to rapidly deploy to crisis areas and remain sustainable, be it within or outside NATO’s territory, in support of both Article 5 and Non-Article 5 operations.
Article 5 is at the basis of a fundamental principle of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. It provides that if a NATO Ally is the victim of an armed attack, each and every other member of the Alliance will consider this act of violence as an armed attack against all members and will take the actions it deems necessary to assist the Ally attacked.
The principle of collective defense is at the very heart of NATO’s founding treaty. It remains a unique and enduring principle that binds its members together, committing them to protect each other and setting a spirit of solidarity within the Alliance.
This principle is enshrined in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. It provides that if a NATO Ally is the victim of an armed attack, each and every other member of the Alliance will consider this act of violence as an armed attack against all members and will take the actions it deems necessary to assist the Ally attacked.
Mr. Abe’s highest political goal is to replace the Constitution written and imposed upon the Japanese by the American Army following World War II. For 67 years, not a single word has been amended. Mr. Abe strongly feels that the Constitution imposes an onerous restriction on Japanese sovereignty and is outdated. Still, as critics point out, he should know that the Constitution’s primary function is to check government power. It is not something that can be altered by the whim of government. Otherwise, there is no reason to bother with having a constitution at all.
アメリカ大使からニューヨーク・タイムズへの謝罪声明文は下記:
Our goal is not to “replace” the Constitution, as the editorial argues, but instead to revisit the interpretation of certain clauses of the Constitution in light of significantly changed circumstances in the Asia-Pacific region since its enactment in 1947.
The Japanese, including Prime Minister Abe, believe in the spirit of Article 9 of the Constitution and have no intention of revising the war-renouncing charter. We are confident about the maturity of our democracy.
KENICHIRO SASAE Ambassador of Japan Washington, May 13, 2014
The New York Times:
The New York Times is an American daily newspaper, founded and continuously published in New York City since September 18, 1851.
It has won 112 Pulitzer Prizes, more than any other news organization.