>>294 そうだよなーw タイトルからしてdisgracedなんて使うのは、酷くないかねえ・・・w しかも挿入ビデオのタイトルがNAKAGAWA'S FATHER COMMITTED SUICIDE
記事の書き出しが↓なのは全海外報道共通なのは仕方ないとして Former Japanese Finance Minister Shoichi Nakagawa, who was forced to resign after appearing drunk at a G7 news conference earlier this year, was found dead in his Tokyo home.
>しかも挿入ビデオのタイトルがNAKAGAWA'S FATHER COMMITTED SUICIDE いや、自殺したはずなんだが、中川の父親。 何か、意味あるのか? ID:qKHa4ZR90
>Former Japanese Finance Minister Shoichi Nakagawa, who was forced to resign >after appearing drunk at a G7 news conference earlier this year, was found dead in his Tokyo home. >使う写真も当然酩酊会見のもの。酷い扱いの死亡記事だなw
>>306 who are you to say to me, "you are making a disgrace of yourself? ?I don't take crap from people like you who is making comments with such a rude manner. Hey, "GET OUTTA MY LIFE!"
>>317 >who are you to say to me, "you are making a disgrace of yourself?
Well, you are making a disgrace of yourself, by showing off English URL which does not have comment on the DRUNKEN behaviour of our honourable MP.
>?I don't take crap from people like you who is making comments with such a rude manner. I am only suggesting the truth, If you call that as rude, then brudder, u huv a big problem!
>Hey, "GET OUTTA MY LIFE!" Well, you don`t have to write in to this thread. I think that is the most sure way of me not involving to your disgraceful life.
>>322 I was watching a figure skating program on TV. Cuz I am a big fan of Mao Asada. Sorry for late reply
The video, "NAKAGAWA'S FATHER COMMITTED SUICIDE" in the article sounds malicious to me. I have got the impression from this article that this video is intended to make fool of the deceased. Although his father commited suicide and that is a truth, the title is inappropriate and very offensive.
Do you still want to continue to post entries in English?
>>343 >I was watching a figure skating program on TV. Cuz I am a big fan of Mao Asada. >Sorry for late reply 英語で返答するのに、時間が掛かったの?w
>The video, "NAKAGAWA'S FATHER COMMITTED SUICIDE" in the article sounds malicious to me. >I have got the impression from this article that this video is intended to make fool of the deceased. >Although his father commited suicide and that is a truth, the title is inappropriate and very offensive.
Could you please define the word, malicious to me, or to the people watching this thread. Also, could you please tell which part video is >intended to make fool of the deceased. ...Just the title? >inappropriate and very offensive
Surely, you could reply much quicker than last time, now that you are not watchin` 浅田真央?
>Do you still want to continue to post entries in English? Well, its up to you? You are the e making a disgrace (of one`s self), not me.
>>346 >Why you are keep asking such a stupid questions? Are you insame?
えっと、釣り? >Are you insame? insameって、何すか? で、 >The video, "NAKAGAWA'S FATHER COMMITTED SUICIDE" in the article sounds malicious to me. >I have got the impression from this article that this video is intended to make fool of the deceased. >Although his father commited suicide and that is a truth, the title is inappropriate and very offensive.
Could you please define the word, malicious to me, or to the people watching this thread. Also, could you please tell which part video is >intended to make fool of the deceased. ...Just the title? >inappropriate and very offensive
Surely, you could reply much quicker than last time, now that you are not watchin` 浅 田 真 央 ? ↑ここ注目
>>356 >I am asking you a question. Why you are keep asking me stupid questions? ? You have not answered my question, You have not clarified your point, nor shown any evidence regarding >intended to make fool of the deceased. except the title >inappropriate and very offensive
When will you going to answer to these questions, which I stated in >345.
Surely, u must answer to >345
before saying this?
>346 名前:名無しさん@十周年[] 投稿日:2009/10/17(土) 20:58:34 ID:qKHa4ZR90 >Why you are keep asking such a stupid questions? Are you insame?
>>360 名前:名無しさん@十周年[] 投稿日:2009/10/17(土) 21:14:06 ID:qKHa4ZR90 >>35 >>If you want to know the definition, just look for a dictionary. That is your home work, not mine.
>>366 >Have you forgot about your qestion? You are the one asking me a definition, you idiot.
About >345 ? I asked you your definition of maliciousness, and your "actual" evidence of maliciousness,
-----------345--------------------------- >The video, "NAKAGAWA'S FATHER COMMITTED SUICIDE" in the article sounds malicious to me. >I have got the impression from this article that this video is intended to make fool of the deceased. >Although his father commited suicide and that is a truth, the title is inappropriate and very offensive.
Could you please define the word, malicious to me, or to the people watching this thread. Also, could you please tell which part video is >intended to make fool of the deceased. ...Just the title? >inappropriate and very offensive
Surely, you could reply much quicker than last time, now that you are not watchin` 浅田真央? -----------345---------------------------
Well, 30minutes has past since I asked about 345, and I still have not got any answer from you,
Still watching 浅田真央? Being BUSY with your LITTLE thing? www
I have no idea what you are going to say in 368. Why I have to show the evidence of maliciousness? If you don't know the definition of the word, it is no point to explain how I have got an impression from the title of the vide.
>>370 >I have no idea what you are going to say in 368. Why I have to show the evidence of maliciousness? Simple. You said that the video "sound malicious". Why? You need to show your definition of maliciousness, and the evidence which you Believe will prove this point.
>If you don't know the definition of the word, it is no point to >explain how I have got an impression from the title of the vide. ビデ?w Well, you obviously does not seem to know the word malice, and how it is used.
No doubt you cannot >explain how I have got an impression from the title of the ビデ. 疑う余地もないw
>>378 >Is it really a big deal? Just a matter of a misused word. >Keep going, nitpicker.
Misused ideas? Or more correctly, misguided ideas? ID:qKHa4ZR90
As I said, You are the e making a disgrace (of one`s self), not me. (from 345). Do continue,,,, You are making a disgrace of yourself... as I also said in >306
>>383 >So prove what yout said in >>306 Now, trying to go to beginning to nullify other suggestions?
つ372 名前:名無しさん@十周年[] 投稿日:2009/10/17(土) 21:50:00 ID:qKHa4ZR90 >If the word, "malicious" is not appropriate in the context, so what?
つ378 名前:名無しさん@十周年[] 投稿日:2009/10/17(土) 22:02:26 ID:qKHa4ZR90 >Is it really a big deal? Just a matter of a misused word.
つ380 名前:名無しさん@十周年[] 投稿日:2009/10/17(土) 22:09:57 ID:qKHa4ZR90 >If the term is not appropriate, that is misused word, not misused ideas.
Not so good at using English words...No evidence of malicious video except the title... You are not good, not FIT to use English, are you ? wwww
>And prove why the artcle and the title of the video is not offensive and inapropriate. Hey, ID:qKHa4ZR90, you started this offensive IDEA. You obviously need to prove this this, unless the ID is 被った..
>343 名前:名無しさん@十周年[] 投稿日:2009/10/17(土) 20:48:59 ID:qKHa4ZR90 >The video, "NAKAGAWA'S FATHER COMMITTED SUICIDE" in the article sounds malicious to me. >I have got the impression from this article that this video is intended to make fool of the deceased. >Although his father commited suicide and that is a truth, the title is inappropriate and very offensive.
Are you the same person? Or are, in old english terms, Schizophrenic(精神分裂症)? 別の人格が言ったの? www
>>386 What do you think about this artcle and the title of the video? Is the term, "disgraced" appropriate term to describe the decase? in the article? Is the title of the video appropriate for the article?
>>395 >What do you think about this artcle and the title of the video? >Is the term, "disgraced" appropriate term to describe the decase? in the article? デケース?w
The matter of fact is, Nakagawa was disgraced in Japanese politics, by the media and the opposition parties. It is a fact, and that is what they write.
>Is the title of the video appropriate for the article? It does not matter whether they are alive or not, as act of disgracing of Nakagawa was committed , by the Japanese people. You cannot hide that.
>>403 >そういうのを重箱の隅をつつくといいますね。 馬鹿な間違いばかりしてるから、突っ込まれるんだろ? マリスの使い方も判らず、 ↓開き直ってるしな↓ >372 名前:名無しさん@十周年[] 投稿日:2009/10/17(土) 21:50:00 ID:qKHa4ZR90 >If the word, "malicious" is not appropriate in the context, so what? >378 名前:名無しさん@十周年[] 投稿日:2009/10/17(土) 22:02:26 ID:qKHa4ZR90 >Is it really a big deal? Just a matter of a misused word. >380 名前:名無しさん@十周年[] 投稿日:2009/10/17(土) 22:09:57 ID:qKHa4ZR90 >If the term is not appropriate, that is misused word, not misused ideas.
>The matter of fact is, Nakagawa was disgraced in Japanese politics, >by the media and the opposition parties. >It is a fact, and that is what they write.
This article does not mention anything what you pointed out above. Why you think he has been disgraced in Japanese olitics, by the media and the opposition parties? Is that your personal belief?
>>410 >Prove what you believe. How Nakagawa has been disgraced by the media and the DPJ ? >Show me the reliable evidence.
So now you are doing the 質問返し、now that you cannot prove the >inappropriate and very offensive part w
つ「Japan's former finance minister Shoichi Nakagawa, who was forced to resign over his apparently drunken behaviour」 The foreign media did not ask for resignation of Nakagawa, However Japanese opposition parties (why only DPJ) and the Japanese media did ask for his resignation.
Circumstantial, but reliable evidence, Problem ? w
>>411 >This article does not mention anything what you pointed out above. >Why you think he has been disgraced in Japanese olitics, by the media and the opposition parties? >Is that your personal belief?
Olitics? not again www And once again, article does mention about the forced resignation, which was then brought about by the continued call for resignation, which "debacle dealt a blow to Aso".
As said, there is no evidence to suggest that these moves were brought about by foreign media. Japanese media and opposition parties asked for his resignation. It is completely a domestics affair, as most of foreign articles reported.
>Japan's former finance minister Shoichi Nakagawa, >who was forced to resign over his apparently drunken behaviour
This is not enough evidence to prove your belief. This sentence does not clearly mention who foreced him to do. Any other sentences in this article to show who forced him to resign?
>As said, there is no evidence to suggest that >these moves were brought about by foreign media. >Japanese media and opposition parties asked for >his resignation. It is completely a domestics affair, >as most of foreign articles reported.
As there are no evidences by the foreign media, and no mention about Japanese media, how can you prove the Japanese media has been the one who forced him to resgin. This artcle does not mention any of what you believe.
>>422 >This is not enough evidence to prove your belief. This sentence does not >clearly mention who foreced him to do. Do what? w As I said, it is a matter of fact that Japanese media and opposition parties asked for the resignation of Nakagawa,
It was not asked by Aso, and it was not asked by the foreign media, which is a fact. It is not my belief, as you would like to put it.
>Any other sentences in this article to show who forced him to resign? Will this satisfies you? from the related article ww
>>424 >As there are no evidences by the foreign media, and no mention about Japanese media, >how can you prove the Japanese media has been the one who forced him to resgin. >This artcle does not mention any of what you believe.
Any of what I believe? Whatever happened to the matter OF opposition party? It appeared on your reference? w Dont be so upset, since you cannot prove any of your point.
As this artcle does not mention, you can not prove what you believe. What you insisted in 404 is just your personal belief. In regard to his resignation, all you and I can find out from this article is that he has been forced to resgin over his apparently "drunken" behaviour.
Although his successful achievement as the Japanese finance minister in G7, no foreign media has been reported any of his great achievements in G7. Nevertheless, almost all media have been utilized his his apparently drunken picuture in their articles.
Do you still believe this article is appropriate? I think the term "disregard" in this title is not necessary as long as this article clearly states who are the peple forced him to resign.
I think the term "disgraced" in this article is not necessary as long as this article can not clearly state who are the peple forced him to resign in this article.
I was watching a news program on TV to see my favorite skater, Mao Asada. Sorry for late reply.
>>437 >As this artcle does not mention, you can not prove what you believe. >What you insisted in 404 is just your personal belief. From this article? I proved from the reference, of this article,,,w
You call that as EVIDENCE, as it is directly related to the article. GOT TO LIMIT YOUR ARGUMENT TO this article? w
>Although his successful achievement as the Japanese finance minister in G7, >no foreign media has been reported any of his great achievements in G7. ? I think you call this as totally inappropirate matter. Is this related to the death of Nakagawa? IS IT SOME POINT YOU WANT TO EMPHASISE FOR sake of YOUR INTENTION?
>Nevertheless, almost all media have been utilized his his apparently drunken picuture in their articles. Once again, inappropirate. Was there any other picture regarding Nakagawa. I do not recal there was one. Once again, IS IT SOME POINT YOU WANT TO EMPHASISE FOR sake of YOUR INTENTION?
>Do you still believe this article is appropriate? It is not a matter of belief, unlike you. It is a fact, as death of his father is a fact, which as said in the vide o, MANY PEOPLE HERE ASSUME COULD HAVE KILLED HIMSELF. >345 ? w >I think the term "disregard" in this title is not necessary as long as this article clearly states >who are the peple forced him to resign. Do explain what you want to say, or whatever You believe w
Need explanation? Want to do, what you call nitpicking? DO LOOK AT >437.
Want to change argument? w
>Although his successful achievement as the Japanese finance minister in G7, >no foreign media has been reported any of his great achievements in G7.
>>439 >.I was watching a news program on TV to see my favorite skater, Mao Asada. >Sorry for late reply.
Hope you are not fiddling THINGS, while doing that. NEED TO CHARGE YOURSELF with ectoplasm sort of things? NOT AGAIN www ↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓ >>343 >I was watching a figure skating program on TV. Cuz I am a big fan of Mao Asada. >Sorry for late reply
>>343 >I was watching a figure skating program on TV. Cuz I am a big fan of Mao Asada. >>439 >.I was watching a news program on TV to see my favorite skater, Mao Asada.
>>343 >I was watching a figure skating program on TV. Cuz I am a big fan of Mao Asada. >>439 >.I was watching a news program on TV to see my favorite skater, Mao Asada.
>>442 >But Nakagawa's offer to step down after parliament passed budget bills was >unlikely to satisfy an emboldened opposition,
How can this sentence prove your personal belief? Does this sentence state "he has been forced to resign by the media? This related article can not be a piece of evidence to prove what you believe in terms of "forced by the Japanese media".
>I think you call this as totally inappropirate matter. >Is this related to the death of Nakagawa? IS IT SOME POINT YOU >WANT TO EMPHASISE FOR sake of YOUR INTENTION?
This article states his father's death, relationship with Aso, and brief explanation of his career as a politician, but any of his achievements in G7 were not stated. Is this fair?
When Bloomberg first reported his death, they used "apparently drunken" picture in their article. Then Bloomberg has been replaced the picture from "apparently drunken" to "no drunken" picture. Do you think why Bloomberg has replaced the picutre of him?
>>I think the term "disgraced" in this article is not necessary as long as this article can not clearly state >>who are the peple forced him to resign in this article. >Do explain what you want to say, or whatever You believe w
The term "disgraced" was not explained clearly in the article whatsoever. No mentioned who made him "disgraced", who are the person forced him to resgin. The term "disgraced" of this title is not a main issue of this article without further explanations. "Disgraced" is not neccesary in this article.
>>458 >How can this sentence prove your personal belief? >Does this sentence state "he has been forced to resign by the media? >This related article can not be a piece of evidence to prove what you believe in >terms of "forced by the Japanese media". Uh hello, there seem to be the word OPPOSITION, written in that sentence,,,,w
>unlikely to satisfy an emboldened opposition, ↑ココネ
>This article states his father's death, relationship with Aso, and brief explanation of his career as a >politician, but any of his achievements in G7 were not stated. Is this fair? It is about his death, if you can rEAD the article. His father seems related, and also about his matter, such as his , outstanding , stance on China and Taiwan. ?
>No mentioned who made him "disgraced", who are the person forced him to resgin. PERSON?
Can you read this? "Emboldened opposition parties had been set to grill Nakagawa again in parliament and have said they would submit a censure motion to the upper house if his answers fail to satisfy.
A censure is non-binding, but a previous cabinet minister quit after a similar resolution."
Surely, you can read this,,,TOO BUSY WATCHING MAO san? Asada san? www
>The term "disgraced" of this title is not a main issue of this article without further explanations. >"Disgraced" is not neccesary in this article. Forced to quit under opposition~s motion is a disgrace,,, Lacking common sense? w >Will you still want to continue? GO ON. Do hope you write a little faster.... TOO MUCH BLOOD IN YOUR HEAD? OR TOO MUCH MAO watching ? which is it ? www
>>466 >What are you talking about? Could you please explain the below >sentences with proper English?
Need explanation? Want to do, what you call nitpicking? DO LOOK AT >442. ? w
>I am handling various tasks at same time, watching TV, posting comments on >other threads in 2ch. Any problems?
Strange thing is, I am doing the same thing, watching the CODE GEARS (w), replying to other thread, AS WELL AS POSTING OTHER COMMENTS TO this thread. Do realize that this thread is about orbituary of the dec e ased Nakagawa by our ex-PM, Aso. I am posting there pictures, inputting some AA...Does seem that I am busy than you are www
>BTW, your reply is hard to read. Can you make it clearly? I think the best thing you could do is, study English a little harder.
>unlikely to satisfy an emboldened opposition, Again, who are they? Does it say any particular person?
>It is about his death, if you can rEAD the article. >His father seems related, and also about his matter, such as his , outstanding , stance on >China and Taiwan. ? Why is his father's suicide related to his dealth? His father's suicide is nothing to do with his death. If you insist his father's death and son's death are related, Prove your personal belief.
>"Emboldened opposition parties had been set to grill Nakagawa again in parliament >and have said they would submit a censure motion to the upper house if his answers fail to satisfy. >A censure is non-binding, but a previous cabinet minister quit after a similar resolution." Again, does this article say the Japanese media forced him to resgin? Prove your personal brief.
>Need explanation? ?Want to do, what you call nitpicking? ?DO LOOK AT >442. ?? w Your English is not clear enogh. Can you clarify what you say? Make sentence in PROPER English.
>Strange thing is, I am doing the same thing, watching the CODE GEARS (w), >replying to other thread, AS WELL AS POSTING OTHER COMMENTS TO >this thread. Do realize that this thread is about orbituary of the dec e ased >Nakagawa by our ex-PM, Aso. I am posting there pictures, inputting >some AA...Does seem that I am busy than you are www How many threads you are handling?
Your English is NOT PROPER English and very unclear. It is not a matter of difficulty. Your English level is just average though.
>>471 >Again, who are they? Does it say any particular person?
w NEED TO SAY SPECIFIC PERSON? 何時、何時何分に、誰がやったの? www
>Why is his father's suicide related to his dealth? His father's suicide is nothing to do with his death. >If you insist his father's death and son's death are related, Prove your personal belief. ? ↓↓ http://www.france24.com/en/20091004-japan-disgraced-former-finance-minister-found-dead-tokyo-g7-drunk-shoichi-nakagawa Natalie Torre says in the vide o that "Many people here(日本のこと) are assuimg that S.N. could have killed himself "(41秒) Natalie Torre also says in the vide o that "this assumption also come from the fact that his father committed suicide"(50秒) MY personal belief? w
>Again, does this article say the Japanese media forced him to resgin? >Prove your personal brief. Again, I said about the OPPOSITION. N? Strange,, you seem to miss that continually. Inconvenient to your belief? w
>>475 These are not PROPER English. Write them in PROPER ENGLISH with SUBJECT and OBJECT. I don't understand your bad English. >Need explanation? ?Want to do, what you call nitpicking? ?DO LOOK AT >442. ?? w
>Also, please define the word average...relative to whom?
>You? >Just kidding? ギャグで言ってるんだろ?↑ w
NO, I am not KIDDING. Your English is just an average level. Do u think you are good at English? Don't make me laugh.
>>478 >All I say is not clear enogh to prove your personal belief. All I AM sayING THAT? ww The point, the sentence OPPOSTION, which means parties opposed to the government, is making a motion for Nakagawa to resign,. "Emboldened opposition parties had been set to grill Nakagawa again in parliament and have said they would submit a censure motion to the upper house if his answers fail to satisfy. A censure is non-binding, but a previous cabinet minister quit after a similar resolution." I am sorry to say that this is NOT MY personal BELIEF, but something written in this URL http://www.france24.com/en/20090217-japan-finance-minister-quit-after-drink-slur-Shoichi-Nakagawa-g7 DOES NOT THIS URL exist in your make believe world? w
>This title of this video, NAKAGAWA'S FATHER COMMITTED SUICIDE >is unacceptable since there was no evidence found when they reported his death. ? The OFFICIAL explanation is that his father committed suicide. Unacceptable? Then you have to prove your BELIEF. CAN you do that? You certainly have not shown ANY evidence in this thread.., Hope not you are doing the same sort of things in other 2ch THREAD.. A pure public nuisance ! ww
>Who are they? >This article along with the related article DO NOT clearly stated. OPPOSITION? It is the party opposed to the government...... It is common sense, yet you want personal names.... 何時、何時何分に、誰がやった? Are you going to say that to the finance24?
Having difficulty holding onto your belief? Hope not you extend that to others, such as the URL You personally put forward! www
>Also, please define the word average...relative to whom? Compared to the people who post their commnets in the below forum. If you believe you are good at English, post your comments on the below forum and prove your English ability. GOOD LUCK! http://www.topix.net/forum/source/wtvf/T1M8V191951BAFEQ9
>>480 >These are not PROPER English. Write them in PROPER ENGLISH with SUBJECT and OBJECT. >I don't understand your bad English.
Uh, you cannot read abbreviated English... what a pity (sob Do you need explanation? What do you want to do? Do you want to do what you call as nitpicking? (warosu) Please , ID:hPteHePG0, DO LOOK AT >442.
Comprehendo? w
>NO, I am not KIDDING. Your English is just an average level. Do u think you are good at English? I do not think I am good. However, I do know that your English is BAD, judging from your inability to state your proofs, or the inability to read the URL you yourself introduced. Relatively speaking, I am DEFINETELY better than you, but that itself is meaningless. Do realize that this knowledge is not at ll comforting. Reason? Most English speakers are BETTER than you, As already stated, it is meaningless, and also , USELESS www
>Don't make me laugh. Yes, I think you should worry about your English. I don~t think you have any time to laugh.
Well, As I said, You are the e making a disgrace (of one`s self), not me. (from 345). DO YOU KNOW THAT? TOO DIFFICULT? www
>>483 >All I AM sayING THAT? ww >The point, the sentence OPPOSTION, which means parties >opposed to the government, is making a motion for Nakagawa to resign,. >"Emboldened opposition parties had been set to grill Nakagawa again i>n parliament and have said they would submit a censure motion to the upper house if his answers fail to satisfy. >A censure is non-binding, but a previous cabinet minister quit after a similar resolution." >I am sorry to say that this is NOT MY personal BELIEF, but something written in this URL >http://www.france24.com/en/20090217-japan-finance-minister-quit-after-drink-slur-Shoichi-Nakagawa-g7 >DOES NOT THIS URL exist in your make believe world? w
Why this article does not clearly state who are the people to force him to resign ? No evidence? Does THIS ARTICLE STATE Japanes media forced him to resign? NO MENTIONED. Your personal brief. Period.
YOU are the PURE public nuisance. How many people call you 荒らし? Nobody call me 荒らし though. haha
The term "OPPPOSION" is not defined in this article. PERIOD.
>Uh, you cannot read abbreviated English... what a pity (sob >Do you need explanation? >What do you want to do? Do you want to do what you call as nitpicking? (warosu) >Please , ID:hPteHePG0, DO LOOK AT >442.
So, what is your point?
>I do not think I am good. However, I do know that your English is BAD, judging from >your inability to state your proofs, or the inability to read the URL you yourself >introduced. >Relatively speaking, I am DEFINETELY better than you, but that itself is meaningless. >Do realize that this knowledge is not at ll comforting. >Reason? Most English speakers are BETTER than you, >As already stated, it is meaningless, and also , USELESS www
Sorry to tell you, but your writing ability is just fair. C+ This is my honest comment on your writing ability.
Christopher Savoieとは? >クリストファー・サボイ氏が釈放される >テーマ:ワールドニュース >2009.9.16 >クリストファー・サボイ氏は、子供達をアメリカに連れ帰らないことを条件に、警察から釈放された。 >子供達とは接触しないことを約束させられたという。そして法的なプロセスは保留となった。 http://ameblo.jp/scalar/entry-10355451210.html
It seems strange that you come up with your topic.. Some kind of プロ市民(Professional Citizens w)?
>If you believe you are good at English, post your comments on the below forum and prove your >English ability. GOOD LUCK! You want me to Comment on >クリストファー・サボイ氏が釈放される ? Why? Hope you are not one of those プロ市民、or some dickhead(ムンクヘッド?) called ミニーfromカナダ? w
Please let me know when you post your commnets on the below forum. People will judge your English.
>Also, please define the word average...relative to whom? Compared to the people who post their commnets in the below forum. If you believe you are good at English, post your comments on the below forum and prove your English ability. GOOD LUCK! http://www.topix.net/forum/source/wtvf/T1M8V191951BAFEQ9
>>487 >Why this article does not clearly state who are the people to force him to resign ? >No evidence? Does THIS ARTICLE STATE Japanes media forced him to resign? >NO MENTIONED. Your personal brief. Period.
NO MENTIONED(棒 PROPER ENGLISH(棒 …wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Got to limit your argument to PERSON... You cannot otherwise win, can you? w >Why this article does not clearly state who are the people to force him to resign ?
>YOU are the PURE public nuisance. How many people call you 荒らし? One? >Nobody call me 荒らし though. haha People seem to say that NOVA PEOPLE should stop doing that,,,, Think that you are not included? What a happy thought! ,,, Happy circuit, as they call in Japan ? www
>The term "OPPPOSION" is not defined in this article. PERIOD. I do not think any one can define "OPPPOSION", unless that spelling is in your dictionaRy.,,,
Do we need to define democracy as well? 何時、何時何分に、誰がやったの? wwww ID:hPteHePG0 wwwwww
>>494 >Pick any of your favorite forum. Not neccessasry the one I chose.
? you did write "If you believe you are good at English, post your comments on the below forum and prove your English ability. GOOD LUCK!" http://www.topix.net/forum/source/wtvf/T1M8V191951BAFEQ9 >below forum>below forum>below forum>below forum ? >クリストファー・サボイ氏が釈放される w
>Post your comments with your nickname, PUBLIC NUISANCE, PICKY, DICKHEAD, >JERK, BASTERD. Need to use Swear words (悪態語) for nickname (ニックネーム)? Oh, ID:hPteHePG0, THAT is rude! Golly! wwww
>Let me know when you finish positing your comments. >GOOD LUCK! Please tell me, which comments you are posting for this site.... Could not afford my compatriots to disgrace our motherland, could I ? ID:hPteHePG0 w
> NO MENTIONED(棒 > PROPER ENGLISH(棒 > …wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
You should see your Physiatrist. Do not forget take your medicine before going to bed, OK?
> Got to limit your argument to PERSON... You cannot otherwise win, can you? w > >Why this article does not clearly state who are the people to force him to resign ? > > n? Vide o says that the was the coverage was widely broadcast in Japan,,, media? w > http://www.france24.com/en/20090217-japan-finance-minister-quit-after-drink-slur-Shoichi-Nakagawa-g7 > >THIS ARTICLE STATE Japanes media forced him to resign? > ? w
Hey, do not forget your question, you idiot. Prove what you brief. If you can't, just your personal brief. PERIOD.
> People seem to say that NOVA PEOPLE should stop doing that,,,, > Think that you are not included? > What a happy thought! ,,, Happy circuit, as they call in Japan ? www
You are particularly pointed out as 荒らし though by>>326 ,>>328>>330 No one call me 荒らし. WHAT IS NOVA PEOPLE? Never heard of it.
> Do we need to define democracy as well? > 何時、何時何分に、誰がやったの? Are you changing a topic? The article does not define or clarify who are the OPPOSITION.
>>504 >You should see your Physiatrist. Do not forget take your medicine before going to bed, OK? Talking to your self? ついに独り言? w
>Hey, do not forget your question, you idiot. Prove what you brief. If you can't, just your personal brief. PERIOD. I did prove my POINT, only that,,,, ID:hPteHePG0 does not seem to see it,,,,hear it? (∩゚д゚)アーアーきこえなーい wwwwwwwww
> though by ? w And, only >>328 says arashi..... you surely could read Japanese?...No? w >WHAT IS NOVA PEOPLE? Never heard of it? Look it up on te respose,,,or once again, (∩゚д゚)アーアーきこえなーい w
>Are you changing a topic? The article does not define or clarify who are the OPPOSITION. OPPPOSION? w >>>495 Anyhow, you usually do not define "Opposition" in newspapers, as you do not define Democracy. You should know what it means to read newspapers...something called commonsense. Have you heard the word,? w Also, the action is taken by the opposition >Emboldened opposition parties had been set to grill Nakagawa again in parliament and have said they would submit a censure motion to the upper house if his answers fail to satisfy. >A censure is non-binding, but a previous cabinet minister quit after a similar resolution. Are saying that sentence do not exist? I did not write this in http://www.france24.com/en/20090217-japan-finance-minister-quit-after-drink-slur-Shoichi-Nakagawa-g7
So, is your point "reply to >>442"? Write in PROPER ENGLISH, OK?
> You call that as EVIDENCE, as it is directly related to the article. > GOT TO LIMIT YOUR ARGUMENT TO this article? w Jus prove your personal belief in this article and related one.
>Although his successful achievement as the Japanese finance minister in G7, >no foreign media has been reported any of his great achievements in G7. >> Is this related to the death of Nakagawa? IS IT SOME POINT YOU > >WANT TO EMPHASISE FOR sake of YOUR INTENTION? > >Nevertheless, almost all media have been utilized his his apparently drunken picuture in their articles. > Once again, inappropirate. Was there any other picture regarding Nakagawa. > I do not recal there was one. Once again, IS IT SOME POINT YOU > WANT TO EMPHASISE FOR sake of YOUR INTENTION?
My point is to prove that this article is inapropriate for the deceased. This article does not mention any of his achievements but his failure in G7, and utilizing his drunk picture in the article. Nevertheless, they implyed that he committed suicide without any proof with video titled "his father committed suicide" .
>>505 You are just changing the topic since you can not prove your personal belief. Very intersing to see how you react.
By the way, do not forget to reply the followoing.
When Bloomberg first reported his death, they used "apparently drunken" picture in their article. Then Bloomberg has been replaced the picture from "apparently drunken" to "no drunken" picture. Do you think why Bloomberg has replaced the picutre of him?
>>501 So, prove your personal thought in a English form. They will judge your English writing ability. >I do not think I am good. However, I do know that your English is BAD, judging from >your inability to state your proofs, or the inability to read the URL you yourself >introduced. >Relatively speaking, I am DEFINETELY better than you, but that itself is meaningless. >Do realize that this knowledge is not at ll comforting. >Reason? Most English speakers are BETTER than you, >As already stated, it is meaningless, and also , USELESS www
Let me know when you finish posting with whatever the forum you choose.
>>506 >Jus prove your personal belief in this article and related one. Well I did prove my point...only that ID:hPteHePG0 DOES seem to see it...>504 The article does not define or clarify who are the OPPOSITION.
Need to explain the term Opposition? 野党とは何かを定義する必要、あるかい?w
>My point is to prove that this article is inapropriate for the deceased. No, your belief....some kind of faith(信仰心)?w
>This article does not mention any of his achievements but his failure >in G7, and utilizing his drunk picture in the article.
The article is, once again, about the death of Nakagawa, and the relation G7 have to it. Achievement as a politician? It does mention of his close tie to 台湾‘s 李登輝....some thing outstanding, Not satisfied? No? w
>Nevertheless, they implyed that he committed suicide without any >proof with video titled "his father committed suicide"
they implyed? Who are tHEy? I did looked at the video and found out that ・Natalie Torre says in the vide o that "Many people here(日本のこと) are assuimg that S.N. could have killed himself "(41秒) ・Natalie Torre also says in the vide o that "this assumption also come from the fact that his father committed suicide"(50秒) http://www.france24.com/en/20091004-japan-disgraced-former-finance-minister-found-dead-tokyo-g7-drunk-shoichi-nakagawa Once again,Who are tHEy? ID:hPteHePG0. Do explain, but >proof with video titled "his father committed suicide" . why do you always mention about the title and NOTHING ELSE, ID:hPteHePG0. DID you really looked at the vide o? Please answer in YES or NO, because I think you have not, ID:hPteHePG0 w
>>508 >So, prove your personal thought in a English form. They will judge your English writing >ability. Have to divert to elsewhere, such as the >クリストファー・サボイ氏が釈放される >テーマ:ワールドニュース >2009.9.16 >クリストファー・サボイ氏は、子供達をアメリカに連れ帰らないことを条件に、警察から釈放された。 >子供達とは接触しないことを約束させられたという。そして法的なプロセスは保留となった。 http://ameblo.jp/scalar/entry-10355451210.html
I do not have such personal THOUGHTS, unlike YOU. I am not an activist,,,w
>Let me know when you finish posting with whatever the forum you choose. >GO ON. Please tell me which forum you are POSTING, together with coMMnets, right? Some 掃除ing is necessary there, you know,
>>507>You are just changing the topic since you can not prove your personal belief. >Very intersing to see how you react. ? これをどうぞw >>474 >Why is his father's suicide related to his dealth? His father's suicide is nothing to do with his death. >If you insist his father's death and son's death are related, Prove your personal belief. ? ↓↓ http://www.france24.com/en/20091004-japan-disgraced-former-finance-minister-found-dead-tokyo-g7-drunk-shoichi-nakagawa Natalie Torre says in the vide o that "Many people here(日本のこと) are assuimg that S.N. could have killed himself "(41秒) Natalie Torre also says in the vide o that "this assumption also come from the fact that his father committed suicide"(50秒) MY personal belief? w >>483 The point, the sentence OPPOSTION, which means parties opposed to the government, is making a motion for Nakagawa to resign,. "Emboldened opposition parties had been set to grill Nakagawa again in parliament and have said they would submit a censure motion to the upper house if his answers fail to satisfy. A censure is non-binding, but a previous cabinet minister quit after a similar resolution." I am sorry to say that this is NOT MY personal BELIEF, but something written in URL YOU OFFERED >>495 >Why this article does not clearly state who are the people to force him to resign ? n? Vide o says that the was the coverage was widely broadcast in Japan,,, media? w http://www.france24.com/en/20090217-japan-finance-minister-quit-after-drink-slur-Shoichi-Nakagawa-g7 >THIS ARTICLE STATE Japanes media forced him to resign? ? w Changing topic?ID:hPteHePG0 www >Then Bloomberg has been replaced the picture from "apparently drunken" to "no drunken" picture. >Do you think why Bloomberg has replaced the picutre of him? Please prove this? ONCE, ID:hPteHePG0 w
>The matter of fact is, Nakagawa was disgraced in Japanese politics, >by the media and the opposition parties. >It is a fact, and that is what they write.
This article does not mention anything what you pointed out above. Why you think he has been disgraced in Japanese olitics, by the media and the opposition parties? Is that your personal belief?
So, you only can prove your personal brief only from the related article? And you COULD NOT prove from the article, eh? I am still waiting when you prove this article AND RELATED ONE states the Japanese media has forced him to resgin. Why his close tie to Taiwan and Mr. Lee would be in the article but his G7 achievements?
>they implyed? Who are tHEy? I did looked at the video and found out that >・Natalie Torre says in the vide o that "Many people here(日本のこと) >are assuimg that S.N. could have killed himself "(41秒) >・Natalie Torre also says in the vide o that >"this assumption also come from the fact that his father committed suicide"(50秒) How can they(France 24) It does not matter whether people are assuming he committed suicide or not, if that is just a rumour, news media does not need to EMPHASISE his father's death. Again, his father's death is nothing to do SN's death even though his killed himself, his father and SN is totally different individual.
The title of the video itself is very unacceptable.
>>514 >This article does not mention anything what you pointed out above. >Why you think he has been disgraced in Japanese olitics, by the media and the opposition parties? >Is that your personal belief?
Olitics? Do stop using simple copy and paste. Also, as I have copied on >>511 the matter of opposition is explained in >483 and >495 Do use an anchor to my response, because others can see that I have included evidence to my claim...アンカ、つけてね? 曖昧にして誤魔化したいキモチは、 イ タ イ ほど良く分かるけどw
How can they(France 24) WHAT? Do write complete English sentences?誤魔化したい? w >It does not matter whether people are assuming he committed suicide or not, >if that is just a rumour, Do realize that his father is officilally diagnosed as committd suicide.
>news media does not need to EMPHASISE his father's death. News media said it as rumour,,, you call that as EMPHASIS? I think you are the ONE that need to see the psychiatrist... What do they call パラノイア these days?
>Again, his father's death is nothing to do SN's death even though his killed himself, >his father and SN is totally different individual. Many people here(日本のこと)are assuimg that S.N. could have killed himself. The possibility of suicide were reported in Japanese media itself, even in NHK, which was ruled out by the police statement. That is what they, the foreign staff, report.
Do you know, that is what is called journalism ? w
>>515 > Also, as I have copied on >>511 > the matter of opposition is explained in >483 and >495 > Do use an anchor to my response, because others can see > that I have included evidence to my claim...アンカ、つけてね? > 曖昧にして誤魔化したいキモチは、 イ タ イ ほど良く分かるけどw I have no intention to make this argument vague. Do you UNDERSTAND? You still can not prove what you say. The term, "OPPOSITION" is too vague and not precise in this article. There are no supporting issue or evidence in this article how the Japanese media have forced him to resgin. This juour who write undefined unclear term in the article, does not prove Japanese media forced him to resgin.
"They" are France 24, AFP, and Nathalie Tourret. How can people cheat while they are arguing? Is that your personal belief again? I do not know what are you talking about.
The title of the video can be different, no need to be video titoled "NAKAGAWA'S FATHER COMMITTED SUICIDE" since there was no proof that he killed himself when the article first reported. Again, he and his father is totally different individuals. His father committed suicide. So, any relations? Again, they are totally different individuals.
> Do realize that his father is officilally diagnosed as committd suicide. > News media said it as rumour,,, you call that as EMPHASIS? As I said, the title is inapropriate. His father's death is nothing to do with SN's dealth.
> The possibility of suicide were reported in Japanese media itself, even in NHK, which > was ruled out by the police statement. > That is what they, the foreign staff, report. I told you many time, hiis possible suicide at that time and his father's death is nothing to do, even though his father's death was officially admitted as a suicide.
> Do you know, that is what is called journalism ? w You don't have to tell me. I already know it.
Have you finished posting your commnets on the English forum? As I said, I think eyour writing ability is just average, Grade 12, C+, not even English 100 level.
If you think your English is good, just show your ability in the English forum. Pick any topic you like and post your comments witht your average writing ability. They will judge your English.
Uhh, Hello, or, good morning, somebody W >>518 >I have no intention to make this argument vague. Do you UNDERSTAND? Switching your argument? You are making your argument vague w I DO UNDERSTAND w
>>You still can not prove what you say. >The term, "OPPOSITION" is too vague and not precise in this article. Too vague and not precise? Repeating the similar terms twice? Opposition is a term used for opposing party to the government, and you do not need to explain such term in full. >483 Also, this Juour, eh , じゃーなりすと?, mentioned of the continual broadcasting in Japanese media, in the video of the related URL. >495
Your not admitting this evidence, is a your problem, the act of NOT BELIEVING, not wanting to see the fact.
>How can people cheat while they are arguing? >Is that your personal belief again? I do not know what are you talking about. You do not know, or more precisely, do not WANT to know the issues laid to you. Once again, .(∩゚д゚)アーアーきこえなーい ? ID:hPteHePG0 If you do not WANT to know, then you obviously need to see the psychiatrist... What do they call 強迫観念 these days? Also, パラノイア? w
>As I said, the title is inapropriate. His father's death is nothing to do with SN's dealth. The connection is argued, even here in Japan, bytheJapanese media, It is not about what YOU BELIEVE. >>519 told you many time, hiis possible suicide at that time and his father's death is nothing to do, even though his father's death was officially admitted as a suicide. ? You did say >there was no evidence found when they reported his death.>478 Officially admitted? You admitted that your made a MISTAKE? Something wrong with your English? Your HEAD? w
>>522 >Have you finished posting your commnets on the English forum? >As I said, I think eyour writing ability is just average, Grade 12, C+, not even >English 100 level.
As I said, your ENGLISH IS A D Material, meaning that you need to go to a Detention([名] [C][U](罰としての)放課後の居残り; 拘留, 監禁;) everyday, every week. Please tell, what is ↓ >As I said, I think eyour writing ability
…eyour?EYOUR? NOT "YOUR"?....Just don`t know how you could ever catch up with school activity at all. DO CONSIDER the necessity of Dentention (放課後の居残り).... you are MUCH MUCH WORSE THAN AVERAGE Japanese 中学生,,,,, At least they can 書ける YOUR, not EYOUR w
>If you think your English is good, just show your ability in the English forum. >Pick any topic you like and post your comments witht your average writing ability. >They will judge your English. >http://www.topix.net/forum/source/wtvf/T1M8V191951BAFEQ9
THIS SITE?
>クリストファー・サボイ氏が釈放される >クリストファー・サボイ氏は、子供達をアメリカに連れ帰らないことを条件に、警察から釈放された。 >子供達とは接触しないことを約束させられたという。そして法的なプロセスは保留となった。 >"Christopher Savoie Released From Japanese Jail."
Like to argue your プロ市民的視点? Do tell which site you are writing in. Don`t want to see others judging your ENGLISH ABILITY, do I? www
V.究極のバラマキ @ 中学生まで一人月額2万6千円(年31万2千円)手当(5.5兆円)但し、配偶者・扶養控除廃止。―家族崩壊促進。民主党は、増税所帯はたった4%だと言う。 ―200万所帯なら切り捨ててよいか。子育ては金だけ配れば良いか。 A 「全ての農林漁業者に一律所得補償」(農業は実は生産費保証のみ―ウソ)やる気と能力がなくなり、日本の農業は間違いなく衰退する。 B 「年金は7万円以上保証(税方式)。2年前の参院選では24兆円かかるが、内追加で6.3兆円必要だと主張したが今回は財源論が全く消えている。 C 「全ての公立高校のみ授業料タダ」(0.5兆円) 私学切捨て、日教組支援。 D 「最低賃金1000円」今の経済情勢ではかえって雇用は失われ、企業は海外へ逃避するか倒産(GM倒産の原因は過度な労働コスト)。 E 「高速道路料金タダ」(2.1兆円)。そうなると借金返済(2兆円)、維持管理(0.6兆)、新規建設は?(公共事業は悪と言っている)。免許証を持たない人や子供からも徴収。 F 「CO2削減 90年比2020年−25%」(試算では所帯36万円負担増) Eの「どんどん車を走らせる」と矛盾。