>201 名前:<丶`∀´>(´・ω・`)(`ハ´ )さん[sage] 投稿日:2008/07/31(木) 09:36:39 ID:or9wNS5M >ソース見つけました。 >現地時間今日夕方のホワイトハウス定例記者会見スクリプト: > >Q In South Korea, the leadership there is very concerned and upset about the U.S. Agency >for Geographic Names changing the designation of a small group of islands to undesignated. >Has there been any thought to revisiting that? Have you all addressed that, given that the >President is going to be there in a few days? > >MR. WILDER: We were contacted by the South Korean government at very high levels and >asked to re-look at this question. The President directed Secretary Rice to check into this >and see exactly what did happen with this change of designation. It was decided after that >review that the change in designation was not warranted at this time. And so that database >is now being restored to where it was prior to this change in designation, I think which occurred >about seven days ago on the database. > >We regret that this change in designation was perceived by South Koreans as some sort of >change in our policy. Let me be very clear that our policy on this territorial dispute has been >firm and consistent since 1952, and that is, we do not take a position on this territorial dispute; >that we believe that South Korea and Japan need to work diplomatically to resolve this issue. >But it is their issue to resolve. > >http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/07/20080730-13.html > >まとめ >・BGNのデータベースは7日前の状態に戻す。 >・アメリカ政府の立場は1952年から一貫していて、この「領土紛争territorial dispute」について >どちらの味方にもならない。日韓の二国間で外交的に解決すべき。
>Q In South Korea, the leadership there is very concerned and upset about the U.S. Agency >for Geographic Names changing the designation of a small group of islands to undesignated. >Has there been any thought to revisiting that? Have you all addressed that, given that the >President is going to be there in a few days? > >MR. WILDER: We were contacted by the South Korean government at very high levels and >asked to re-look at this question. The President directed Secretary Rice to check into this >and see exactly what did happen with this change of designation. It was decided after that >review that the change in designation was not warranted at this time. And so that database >is now being restored to where it was prior to this change in designation, I think which occurred >about seven days ago on the database. > >We regret that this change in designation was perceived by South Koreans as some sort of >change in our policy. Let me be very clear that our policy on this territorial dispute has been >firm and consistent since 1952, and that is, we do not take a position on this territorial dispute; >that we believe that South Korea and Japan need to work diplomatically to resolve this issue. >But it is their issue to resolve. > >http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/07/20080730-13.html > >まとめ >・BGNのデータベースは7日前の状態に戻す。 >・アメリカ政府の立場は1952年から一貫していて、この「領土紛争territorial dispute」について >どちらの味方にもならない。日韓の二国間で外交的に解決すべき。