【韓国】ドイツ人教授、独島をめぐる日本の主張を激しく批判 [04/06]

英語訳；

In English:
The South Korean president warns Dokdo or Takeshima right and history
in the road of Korea in a "letter to the people" roughly MOO Hyun
before a "diplomatic war" with Japan - last stage in recently again a
high-cooked old controversy over two rock in the sea, together as
largely as four sports fields. Takeshima, explained recently in Seoul
a Japanese diplomat, who is the clock so important for its profession
not evenly second nature, is historical and after international right
Japanese territory. Dokdo, how the Koreans call the uninhabited reefs,
is unverbruechlich Korean, answers these. Protests on the road,
completely excited one cut themselves off before the Japanese
message finger: With their blood they want to defend the homeland.
The Japanese State Department stirs up off.
Japan works on good relations with the neighbour,
and in all other respects one can go with
the Takeshima/Dokdo problem to the international Court of Justice
to the Hague

よくまぁ、いろんなとこから教授様をひっぱりだしてくること。
そんなことやってないで早く国際司法裁判所出てきなよ。

>1日本関連で何かあるとこういうドイツ人みたいな白人種が毎回湧いてくるが日本は相手にしてないつもりでも黙ってる事は不利。
まあ今回は戯れ言みたいもんだけど

英語訳；その2
In English:
Impartial ones decide to leave, are that no fair and meaningful
suggestion? For the solution of territorial conflicts
the international Court of Justice can be only called,
if both parties agree. Seoul rejected after course the Hague
so far and will still not walk on it. Therein the fear
being subject to see, would certainly be called, to misjudge
the historical dimension of the problem. If a country has
reason to doubt that international law is something else than
the right of the stronger one, then it is Korea.
Because international law was the instrument,
with which the almost existence of the Korean state was eliminated
and its Annexion were set by Japan into the work.
Of Japan colonial rule over Korea, Japanese politicians stress still
today, were legal. For Korea is connected the Hague with
particularly bad and painful memories. - before one hundred years
the closed contract from Portsmouth to the completion of the Russian-Japanese war,
obtained by the American president Theodore Roosevelt,
made Korea the Japanese protectorate. Roosevelt got the Nobel peace prize.
Korea lost the right to notice its interests with regard to foreign policy themselves.
The Korean emperor Kojong tried to prevent by sending 1907 three envoys to
the second international conference of peace after the Hague,
in order against the protectorate contract protest to insert.
They had however no success, it were not even belonged,
because the 43 met states accepted sovereigns states,
evenly those, as participants in zirkulaerer logic only
which were invited to the conference.

超訳すると、


「ハーグ密使事件でウリナラは国際的に締め出されたのに、
今回国際法廷に出ろという日本の提案はずるいニダ」

と言うのが韓国の立場だろう、とクルマス教授は言っている、とスイスの新聞は書いている。
それだけのこと。

つーか、スレに書き込むヤツはスレタイだけでリアクション取らずにちょっと前のログを読め。
この教授の記事が朝鮮日報によってホルホルされてる事がわかるだろ。

>>370
放っておいても、この件でドイツ方面から叩かれたりして。

>>1
鼻薬かがされてるっぽいな。
それよりも北海道や沖縄の日本帰属は半島の話が関わる以前、はるか昔の話ですが
その頃は鎖国の真っ盛りなのに膨張政策もへったくれもあったもんじゃない
勉強しなおせ、学者の癖に何学んでいるんだ？


と思ったらｳﾘﾅﾗフィルター適用後だったのかよ・・・orz

「1870年代から悪巧みして〜」という部分は完全な捏造なんだな

英語訳；その2
In English:
Stateless people of areas knew itself "powers" after the conceptions
of the international law 19. Century it acquire, their status as such
consisted substantially of the fact that they did. Japan had ascended
only recently into this erlauchten circle. After the Americans had forced
the Japanese in the middle of the century with reproached cannons to open
their country for international traffic their politicians had early recognized
that the only possibility, the Kolonialisierung consisted to escape,
of it, becoming even colonial power - and expanding.

ドイツ年なのに、残念です。
ドイツ人教授、多分法則が発動します

スレ立て直した方が良くない？またチョンの捏造発覚って

こんな記事流してから、10日に訪独するノムは（ry

英語訳；その4
In English:
The Korean peninsula was to Okinawa and Hokkaido the nearest goal of
the expansion. Although the kingdom had governed itself
for centuries themselves, Tokyo worked for the 1870er years
systematically to undermine its autonomy for which purpose
it availed itself much sent up to then only of the international right valid
as dictation of powers over so-called treaty ports.
In this way it succeeded to Japan to form themselves
as guarantor of the international right in Eastern Asia and
at the same time to cement its requirement on Korea.
Both sides of this process were linked unsolvably with one another.
Japan kept its independence by the fact that it took Korea the its.
To the conference of peace into the Hague Korea with
agreement of the community of states was represented by Japan.
The elimination of his existence by the international right of
the stamps of the legality one pushed open in this way.
In a secret treaty from July 1905 Washington and
Tokyo exchanged the supremacy of the USA in the Philippines for Japan in Korea.
In the anglo Japanese alliance one month later India and Burma were up-counted against Korea.
With that Hague conference of peace 1907 did not need to be afraid Tokyo
any longer that its requirement on Korea was contested.

このドイツ人教授をご存じですか？とソース付きでクライン孝子さん
にメールを送っておきました。皆さんも、クライン孝子さんにこの人は？
というメールを送ってみては？
でも、最近クライン孝子さんのＰＣの具合が余りヨロシクないらしい・・・
チョンの仕業かもしれな（ry
http://www2.diary.ne.jp/user/119209/

>>370
世界最強の竹島研究家は日本の島根県だか鳥取県だかにいたはず。

朝鮮半島側に残っていた文献も目を通し、日本国内の史料にも精通した
第一人者だったと思う。

>>372
「ハーグ密使事件でウリナラは国際的に締め出されたのに、
今回国際法廷に出ろという日本の提案はずるいニダ」

つまりこのドイツ人教授は、
韓国は日本領韓国自治区かなにかだと思ってる訳か？

思ったより1だけ読んで脊髄反射する奴が多い・・・
日本人でもこうなのだから、日本人以外がこの記事読んだケースを考えると怖いよ・・・

日本にいるロシア人の大学教授も、母国をかばって、日露戦争を帝国主義国家どうしの
領土の分捕り合いって自分の祖国に都合のいい評価してたなあ。俺は、（ﾟДﾟ）ﾊｧ?　だったが。　

英語訳；その5
In English:
Just in this time, in January 1905, explained today disputed islands to Tokyo
those as Japanese national territory.
In the February of the same yearly those made Korea opposite
prefecture Shimane Takeshima partially an administrative district.
Now, one hundred years later, the prefecture 22 February as
the "day Takeshimas" explained, what the Koreans at least just as verbittert,
as that the Japanese State Department maintains a Website,
in which today's Korean control of the islands offence against international right is called.

英語訳；その6　ラスト
In English:
The Japanese government stated, the explanation of 1905 does not have to do
anything with the Annexion the Korean peninsula.
The Korean government however regards this explanation as part of of
Japan colonial policy and does everything, so that this thought remains awake in the population.
Therefore the waves strike again once highly around the rock of Dokdo/Takeshima,
around which to argue for material reasons certainly is not worthwhile oneself.
One speaks of rich fischgruenden; by far more importantly however is the historical Abgruende.

Florian Coulmas