ttp://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=21467_Japan_Considering_Preemptive_Strike_Against_N._Korea#comments Monday, July 10, 2006 Japan Considering Preemptive Strike Against N. Korea(AP通信記事) ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー #3 V the K 7/10/2006 09:03AM PDT Japan is considering a pre-emptive strike? With what? Japan has no offensive capabilities to speak of. 日本の軍隊は、攻撃能力がないはずだが? ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー #14 Roger 7/10/2006 09:08AM PDT They can purchase what they need from an ally. 日本は必要な軍備を、同盟国から幾らでも買えるよん ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー #21 warnergt 7/10/2006 09:12AM PDT Tora! Tora! Tora! トラ! トラ! トラ! ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー #25 kynna 7/10/2006 09:14AM PDT The Japanese will do what they have to. I believe they can arm up very quickly with the help of allies or with no help at all. I think they'd like to see the threat sink in while they work on the logistics. If the threat/promise works then we're good. If they have to go to action, I believe they will. 日本人たちは必要と思えば何でもやるだろうさ。私が思うに、日本人は同盟国が支援すれば大変 素早く、それに、たとえ支援が全くなくとも、やってのけると思う。日本人は軍備増強をするこ とで脅威が減らせると思っていると思う。脅威にに本当に(軍事的に)対処しなくてはならない なら、日本人はやると思うね。
>>719 #30 alegrias 7/10/2006 09:15AM PDT I welcome and support our ally and fully Westernized Japan's remilitarization against primitives, Communists and nuclear nutjobs. Thank you Japan for standing with us in Iraq. 私は西欧化された日本の再軍備を歓迎する。それは、あの幼稚な共産主義者の核保有のDQN 達にに対抗することになる。 ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー #32 Rancher 7/10/2006 09:16AM PDT Even MacArthur thought Japan should have the ability to wage war, and that was when we were there rebuilding. Problem is, just as with Europe, we provide for their defense. マッカーサーでさえ日本が戦争を防ぐ能力を持つべきと言っていたからな。それはアメリカの 駐留軍が戦後の日本にいた頃のことだが。 欧州と同じ事情で、アメリカが彼らを守ってきた。 ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー #41 Black George Bush 7/10/2006 09:22AM PDT Im glad Japan is on our side this go-round. (第二次大戦と違って)日本が今度はこちら側についているというのはイイ ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー #73 Occasional Reader 7/10/2006 09:43AM PDT If Japan does attack, I insist that they code-name it "Operation Hello Kitty". 日本が北朝鮮を攻撃するなら、作戦名は「オペレーション・ハロー・キティ」だな ーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーーー #108 Catttt 7/10/2006 10:24AM PDT Oh oh. I had a temp job with a Japanese firm. They were nice as could be at all times, even when they were pissed off. One had to learn what "pissed off" looked like, or "felt" like, and why. This is a sign that the Japanese are really pissed off. おやおや、 私は日本企業でテンプで働いたことがあるけど、連中はいい奴だよ。で日本人が切れると、ど うなるのか学ぶわけだが、これは、日本人が切れているというサインだね。
>>722 #3 V the K 7/10/2006 09:03AM PDT Japan is considering a pre-emptive strike? With what? Japan has no offensive capabilities to speak of. 日本の軍隊は、攻撃能力がないはずだが
As cool as this sounds I believe the Japanese may be talking tough to give us some leverage in our negotiations with China. A reinvigorated Japanese military would scare the bejesus out of everyone in the region. There’s also the question of whether Japan is even capable of carrying out such a strike: クールに聞こえる話で、このAP記事が伝えるところから見て、日本はアメリカが中国に交渉す る上でレバレッジになるようなタフなスタンスを取っているようだ。再活性化された日本の軍隊 はアジア地域の全てのひとを恐れさせるだろう。日本が本当に攻撃が可能なのかという疑問は残 るのだが。
The news this morning that Japan is considering a pre-emptive strike on North Korean missile bases comes as no particular surprise to me. It also would come of no particular suprise to learn that the Japanese have been and are far better armed than the world ever thought they were. The most powerful and closest military alliance is no longer NATO and has not been for a quite a while. The most powerful such alliance is the USA and Japan. Not far out on the periphery of this alliance are India and Israel.
>The most powerful and closest military alliance is no longer NATO and has not been >for a quite a while. The most powerful such alliance is the USA and Japan.