■■■■■■■■■■■■ただいまの指令■■■■■■■■■■■■ CNNの<新しい質問> Should Beijing apologize for damage by protesters of Japanese property in China? (中国は、日本の施設損壊の謝罪をするべきか。)→当然“Yes” ttp://edition.cnn.com/ ・新しいツール「破壊謝罪砲」は↓ここ↓! 受信パスはvip 解凍パスは手振ってるAAが言ってる四文字の言葉(※パスワードに関する発言は厳禁!中国側に流出の危険大) ttp://www.uploda.org/file/uporg78186.zip.html ・解凍パスがわからないヤシはしばしロムれ!でないと工作員とみなされる ・解凍パスの入力方法がわからない奴は、とりあえずメモ帳かなにかで入力後、パスワード覧へコピペ(Ctrl+V)
The Chinese government has been rather hard on Japan for some time, but especially in recent months. Many Japanese consider the Chinese government at least an accessory after the fact in the student attacks on the Japanese Consulate in Shanghai. It is plain to see that the Chinese police aren't overzealous in putting a stop to the vandalism of Japanese property.
More generally, the Japanese are getting tired of the Chinese government's selective use of history. The Chinese government is demanding yet another apology from the Japanese government for the Rape of Nanking and other acts of Japanese brutality in China before and during World War II. At the same time, it treats any reference to the more recent, and continuing, Chinese brutality in Tibet as contrary to the rules of international discourse.
Since Tibet has been incorporated into China, what goes on there is an internal matter, and foreigners have no right to discuss it. Many Japanese have lost patience with this one-sided spirit of criticism. Following is a Japanese comment on the question of relative culpability, Japanese and Chinese.