このページに関してのお問い合わせはこちら
CPUアーキテクチャについて語れ Part.13
ツイート
484
:
MACオタ
:
2008/11/18(火) 17:09:27 ID:+48X3kSh
正式発表に合わせてCore i7のSPEC2006が公開されたす。
代表的なハイエンドプロセッサの成績と比較しておくす。OS等わバラバラなので参考程度に
しておいて欲しいす。
■SPECint2006
Nehalem/3.2GHz: 30.2 (base) / 33.6 (peak)
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081024-05711.html
Penryn/3.2GHz: 27.0 / 29.7
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081024-05695.html
POWER6/4.7GHz: 17.8 / 21.7
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20071030-02416.html
Montecito/1.66GHz: 15.7 / 17.0
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20071015-02284.html
Barcelona/2.5GHz: 14.4 / 16.2
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080721-04794.html
POWER5+/2.2GHz: 10.5 / 13.2
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q1/cpu2006-20070215-00481.html
SPARC64 VII/2.5GHz: 11.5 / 12.6
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081023-05678.html
Pentium4/3.8GHz: 11.6 / 12.3
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q3/cpu2006-20060513-00018.html
485
:
MACオタ@続き
:2008/11/18(火) 17:23:48 ID:+48X3kSh
■SPECfp2006
Nehalem/3.2GHz: 31.7 (base) / 33.6 (peak)
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081024-05709.html
SPARC64 VII/2.5GHz: 25.0 / 28.8
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080711-04734.html
Penryn/3.2GHz: 24.5 / 25.3
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081024-05693.html
POWER6/5.0GHz: 20.1 / 24.9
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q2/cpu2006-20080407-04057.html
Montecito/1.66GHz: 19.9 / 20.4
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20071015-02285.html
Barcelona/2.5GHz: 18.5 / 19.7
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080721-04798.html
POWER5+/2.2GHz: 12.9 / 14.9
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q1/cpu2006-20070215-00483.html
Pentium4/3.8GHz: 11.9 / 12.1
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q3/cpu2006-20060513-00017.html
486
:
MACオタ@続き
:2008/11/18(火) 17:57:01 ID:+48X3kSh
■SPECint_rate2006 (8-threads)
Dual Penryn/3.2GHz: 145 (base) / 156 (peak)
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081013-05591.html
Dual Shanghai/2.7GHz: 113 / 136
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081024-05683.html
Single Nehalem/3.2GHz: 117 / 124
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081024-05712.html
Dual POWER6/4.7GHz: 108 / 122
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20071030-02417.html
Quad Windsor/3.2GHz: 102 / 119
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q2/cpu2006-20080331-04035.html
Dual Barcelona/2.5GHz: 92.7 / 108
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080801-04850.html
Quad Montecito/1.6Ghz: 94.7 / 102
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2006q4/cpu2006-20060918-00102.html
Dual POWER5+/2.1GHz: 47.9 / 53.3
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q1/cpu2006-20070205-00339.html
Single SPARC64 VII/2.52GHz: 36.9 / 40.8
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081023-05680.html
487
:
MACオタ@続き
:2008/11/18(火) 18:11:56 ID:+48X3kSh
■SPECfp_rate2006 (8-threads)
Dual Shanghai/2.7GHz: 105 (base) / 118 (peak)
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081024-05684.html
Dual POWER6/4.7GHz: 102 / 115
http://www.spec.orgcpu2006/results/res2007q4/cpu2006-20071030-02421.html
Quad Windsor/3.2Ghz: 95.3 / 103
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q2/cpu2006-20080527-04440.html
Dual Penryn/3.4GHz: 87.2 / 95.6
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20080915-05364.html
Dual Barcelona/2.5GHz: 86.3 / 94.7
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080623-04663.html
Quad Montecito/1.6GHz: 87.4 / 90.8
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q3/cpu2006-20080623-04663.html
Single Nehalem/3.2GHz: 82.9 / 86.1
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081024-05710.html
Dual POWER5+/2.1GHz: 57.2 / 62.5
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2007q1/cpu2006-20070205-00340.html
Single SPARC64 VII/2.52GHz: 33.6 / 35.2
http://www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2008q4/cpu2006-20081023-05679.html
488
:
MACオタ@ここまで
:2008/11/18(火) 18:15:09 ID:+48X3kSh
>>484-485
のシングルタスクのSPECint/SPECfpにshanghaiの登録が無いのわ残念
すけど、Nehalemのスゴさわ揺るがないす。
なお、int, fp共にrateの成績に関してわSMTをサポートしているプロセッサわ若干不利である
ことを割り引いて見て欲しいす。Nehalem, POWER6, POWER5+, SPARC64 VIIが該当するす。