Let's talk with Jim-san.on HK.

Dear Jim-san,

One problem happened now.
You were sentenced in the interim order from the Tokyo district court on May 9th 2011.
http://www.alcien.jp/upload/h23-1316b.pdf
There are a lot of deletion request which are based on the interim order.
http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1163483739/331-334

I am thinking so,
If there is not refutation 7 days later to the deletion request, you permit deletion.
What do you think?

>>192
This court does not have jurisdiction over the Pink Channel servers.
That would have to be done in Carson City Nevada, or maybe San Francisco California.
I see my name, and many old posts on archive servers.
This person has taken a lot of time and effort to do this. Did they ever
ask for a deletion request on our boards, and if they did it might not have been
justified since it is about an actress who is at least B level.
If it is justifiable for deletion, then we can delete, but that court order is not

I knew that the interim order was outside for you.
However, in future, may I report similar order to you?

Thank you.

>>193
Yes please do. thank you for reporting this.

Getting interim order is one of the ways at 2ch for requesting deletion officially.
You had better keep in mind that this might be taken for a proof the
lawyer requested for deletion officially and you did not delete them
within reasonable period of time when they will do official lawsuit at
NV/SF later date. (Not following BBS's official way for requesting
deletion does not matter.)

>>196
I know this might sound offensive, but what happens in Japan does not
matter. This court order actually has no affect, those posts from 2002 and 2003
are valid, and do not need to be deleted.

>>197
Who is going to pay 300,000 yen?
I think that the later additional money is caused.

You say "2002 and 2003 are valid , and do not need to be deleted.'
BUT,BUT,BUT,
Do you understand, for example, the following contents?
http://pink.bbspink.com/avideo/kako/1030/10305/1030511504.html
71

>>198
Please paraphrase for me? I understand the date stamp, and the fact that it is 8 years to late to complain.

>>197
Well, although Japanese court order may not have any effect to you,
the fact remains that you now know the requests were made and ignored.
That may be used for unfavorable proof at official trial in the U.S.
against you. I'm not blackmailing to you or anything, just suggestion
since the lawyer seemed to be serious like doing 300,000 yen deposition
getting the interim order.

>>199
http://pink.bbspink.com/avideo/kako/1030/10305/1030511504.html
71

71 名前： 名無しさん＠ピンキー 投稿日： 02/09/12 03:13 ID:tGDXVVvI
> AV actress name.
> The real name.
> A birthplace.
> The high school which graduated.

>>201
Thank you for paraphrasing for me.
>>200
Lawyers can often be very expensive, and very often the return for the investment in their time does not give you a return.

>>193
正式な削除依頼がされていました

http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1163483739/331-334の削除依頼

削除依頼
http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1157125852/782
http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1157125852/788

削除判断　過去ログ削除作業が放置中のために未判断

>>202
Since Japanese court admitted they are worth deleting,
U.S. court may also rule the same and the fact you refused
makes you liable for restitution. I just wondered why
you are going to take such a risk (not deleting) If you
talked with your lawyer about this and got your relief,
I won't say anything anymore though.