Let's talk with Jim-san.on HK.

There are considerably many voices to expect the deletion work start of the reply of the contribution to promote the public performance act of the thread of Jim さんへるす (reply deletion), but does think in a direction done how?

Dear Jim-san,

One problem happened now.
You were sentenced in the interim order from the Tokyo district court on May 9th 2011.
http://www.alcien.jp/upload/h23-1316b.pdf
There are a lot of deletion request which are based on the interim order.
http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1163483739/331-334

I am thinking so,
If there is not refutation 7 days later to the deletion request, you permit deletion.
What do you think?

>>192
This court does not have jurisdiction over the Pink Channel servers.
That would have to be done in Carson City Nevada, or maybe San Francisco California.
I see my name, and many old posts on archive servers.
This person has taken a lot of time and effort to do this. Did they ever
ask for a deletion request on our boards, and if they did it might not have been
justified since it is about an actress who is at least B level.
If it is justifiable for deletion, then we can delete, but that court order is not

I knew that the interim order was outside for you.
However, in future, may I report similar order to you?

Thank you.

>>193
Yes please do. thank you for reporting this.

Getting interim order is one of the ways at 2ch for requesting deletion officially.
You had better keep in mind that this might be taken for a proof the
lawyer requested for deletion officially and you did not delete them
within reasonable period of time when they will do official lawsuit at
NV/SF later date. (Not following BBS's official way for requesting
deletion does not matter.)

>>196
I know this might sound offensive, but what happens in Japan does not
matter. This court order actually has no affect, those posts from 2002 and 2003
are valid, and do not need to be deleted.

>>197
Who is going to pay 300,000 yen?
I think that the later additional money is caused.

You say "2002 and 2003 are valid , and do not need to be deleted.'
BUT,BUT,BUT,
Do you understand, for example, the following contents?
http://pink.bbspink.com/avideo/kako/1030/10305/1030511504.html
71

>>198
Please paraphrase for me? I understand the date stamp, and the fact that it is 8 years to late to complain.

>>197
Well, although Japanese court order may not have any effect to you,
the fact remains that you now know the requests were made and ignored.
That may be used for unfavorable proof at official trial in the U.S.
against you. I'm not blackmailing to you or anything, just suggestion
since the lawyer seemed to be serious like doing 300,000 yen deposition
getting the interim order.

>>199
http://pink.bbspink.com/avideo/kako/1030/10305/1030511504.html
71

71 名前： 名無しさん＠ピンキー 投稿日： 02/09/12 03:13 ID:tGDXVVvI
> AV actress name.
> The real name.
> A birthplace.
> The high school which graduated.

>>201
Thank you for paraphrasing for me.
>>200
Lawyers can often be very expensive, and very often the return for the investment in their time does not give you a return.

>>193
正式な削除依頼がされていました

http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1163483739/331-334の削除依頼

削除依頼
http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1157125852/782
http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1157125852/788

削除判断　過去ログ削除作業が放置中のために未判断

>>202
Since Japanese court admitted they are worth deleting,
U.S. court may also rule the same and the fact you refused
makes you liable for restitution. I just wondered why
you are going to take such a risk (not deleting) If you
talked with your lawyer about this and got your relief,
I won't say anything anymore though.

『特定電気通信役務提供者の損害賠償責任の制限及び発信者情報の開示に関する法律』に基づき発信者情報の開示を求めたく、どこにご連絡・ご依頼をしていいのか和訳にてご教示願います。

まぬけが、あたりを話しているあなたである？

>>206

意味がよくわかりません
ネット用語ではなく、正しい日本語で教えてください

>>207
その外国人はまるで母国語のように日本語を話した。

>>208

おっしゃることはわかりました。

アメリカがネットに対して緩やかなのは、基本的人権を巨大な権力から守り、その対抗処置として、ネットの力を認めてます。
中国に対して、アメリカが激しく批判を展開したのも、そういう背景からだと思います。

今回の件は、カキコミそのものもさることながら、彼等とバトルした私に大きな責任があり大変申し訳なく思いますが、その自由さが自分より弱い立場の侵害に向けられるべきではないと思います。

私の案件以外にも多数の削除依頼が寄せられており、順次処理されるのを待つしかないとは、思います。

しかし、今後の教訓として、ハンドルネームの付与や登録はフェイスブックとか、カキコミの本人責任の制約条件を講じることを検討すべきではないでしょうか？

削除については、粛々と待ち、煽られてもスレッドへのカキコミも控えます。
連投は止めます。

長々とすいませんでした。

レンジャーが道を拓く。君は常軌を逸しているよ。打ち挙げます。挙る微妙な情勢です。
彼は何らかの解決策を提案しましたか。問題の解決策を考え出す。

I am hard to use a new deletion system very much.
I want I contact Itadaki-san and to make a conventional thing.

>>211
Good morning Witch-san. What we have is currently the result of input from volunteers. Please make your suggestions for it. We can't go backwards, we can only go forwards.

I illustrated it.
May I transmit png Image?

>>213
Please email the photo here.
[email protected]
Then we can all look at it.

http://emailgenki.com/uploads/11/06/29045113.jpg

[email protected]
日付2011年6月29日9:50

>>215
That file is not found. Please send to [email protected]
There is no [email protected] email.

Hi Witch-san, how are you today?

Hello.
I transmitted an email again last night.

[email protected] ＆ jin@bbsp‥‥

jin → jim

Hi Witch-san
That is not my email. It is an automatic email for uploading photos.
You did cc my personal email address. Why don't you put that link here?
However I already looked at it, and it looks like the old system that caused us much trouble and heartache a few months ago. We won't go back to that system.
If you have so ideas from it we can discuss on the deleter thread and if others are
interested we have engineers assigned to Pink channel that can make changes.
We have been doing that for several months and there have been many changes and tests.

>>221
Yes, that resembled old system.
Cannot you lock it with pink about the trouble?
I want the system which can work in a click than copy & paste.

Because it was the details about the system, I did not write it here.
I did not know that I was shown by the transmission of the image.
Because >>216 did not arrive at Jim-san., I used CC.

Because I am going to take a rest from tomorrow, I end the talk.

官僚は旧法規の改正に関して、成り行きを見守っています。

>>222
Take care friend.

>>224
show running-config

We encountered to one deletion problem.

The megami board has "no redistribution" in local rule.
In the deletion about that rule, first picture URL was deleted
as the cause of the redistribution along with the deletion of redistributed URL.
I think I want to ask you an opinion about whether or not to
preserve first picture URL even if there is redistribution's danger.

>>226
When in doubt deletion is better.

>>227
Is that about all the deletion matters?
Or is it only about the important deletion matter?

>>228
I think I made some confusion. Sorry about that.
For normal deletion matters, not deleting if you are uncertain.
For important deletion matters, please delete if doubtful. 重点削除

>>229
Thank you for your reply.
I understood these.

Again, I am sorry for any misunderstanding.

>>228
何故 重点削除だけを質問するのですか？

226 名前：Primavera ◆FLOWERqR32 投稿日：2012/04/22(日) 21:34:22.48 ID:lHqeNG4h0
削除に関するところで揉めています。

女神板はLRで「転載禁止」となっています。
それに準拠して、元画像のURLを転載の原因となっているとして削除しました。
例え転載の原因となっても、元画像のURLを保存すべきかお尋ねします。

227 名前：jim ◆IamTAAl4HA 投稿日：2012/04/22(日) 22:29:03.34 ID:69xkOv1M0
>>226
怪しいから削除したほうが良いと思うならね。

228 名前： ◆JACK/GoIHM 投稿日：2012/04/23(月) 12:33:12.46 ID:YVNVtXZK0
>>227
全ての削除対象について言ってるんですか？
それとも重点削除対象について言ってるんですか。

229 名前：自夢 ◆IamTAAl4HA 投稿日：2012/04/23(月) 13:55:58.62 ID:wLZ66RL/0
>>228
取り乱したようだ。すまない。
通常削除対象については、迷ったら削除しないで良い。
だがしかし、重点削除対象については怪しいと思ったら削除してくれ。

230 名前： ◆JACK/GoIHM 投稿日：2012/04/23(月) 14:15:51.73 ID:YVNVtXZK0
>>229
ご回答ありがとうございます。
理解しました。

231 名前：自夢 ◆IamTAAl4HA 投稿日：2012/04/23(月) 15:25:47.03 ID:c/b45mUN0
ああ、誤解して本当に申し訳なかった。

>>Jim-san

One person of Deleter did deletion work.
And I think that the work of him/her has a mistake.
I want to solve that problem by discussion.
That discussion is in progress by the following thread.
運営ボランティアさん指導部屋　3号室
http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1274930319/

Is this solution good?

>>234
Yes, that is a good idea.