There are considerably many voices to expect the deletion work start of the reply of the contribution to promote the public performance act of the thread of Jim さんへるす (reply deletion), but does think in a direction done how?
>>192 This court does not have jurisdiction over the Pink Channel servers. That would have to be done in Carson City Nevada, or maybe San Francisco California. I see my name, and many old posts on archive servers. This person has taken a lot of time and effort to do this. Did they ever ask for a deletion request on our boards, and if they did it might not have been justified since it is about an actress who is at least B level. If it is justifiable for deletion, then we can delete, but that court order is not
Getting interim order is one of the ways at 2ch for requesting deletion officially. You had better keep in mind that this might be taken for a proof the lawyer requested for deletion officially and you did not delete them within reasonable period of time when they will do official lawsuit at NV/SF later date. (Not following BBS's official way for requesting deletion does not matter.)
>>196 I know this might sound offensive, but what happens in Japan does not matter. This court order actually has no affect, those posts from 2002 and 2003 are valid, and do not need to be deleted.
>>197 Well, although Japanese court order may not have any effect to you, the fact remains that you now know the requests were made and ignored. That may be used for unfavorable proof at official trial in the U.S. against you. I'm not blackmailing to you or anything, just suggestion since the lawyer seemed to be serious like doing 300,000 yen deposition getting the interim order.
>>201 Thank you for paraphrasing for me. >>200 Lawyers can often be very expensive, and very often the return for the investment in their time does not give you a return.
>>202 Since Japanese court admitted they are worth deleting, U.S. court may also rule the same and the fact you refused makes you liable for restitution. I just wondered why you are going to take such a risk (not deleting) If you talked with your lawyer about this and got your relief, I won't say anything anymore though.
>>211 Good morning Witch-san. What we have is currently the result of input from volunteers. Please make your suggestions for it. We can't go backwards, we can only go forwards.
Hi Witch-san That is not my email. It is an automatic email for uploading photos. You did cc my personal email address. Why don't you put that link here? However I already looked at it, and it looks like the old system that caused us much trouble and heartache a few months ago. We won't go back to that system. If you have so ideas from it we can discuss on the deleter thread and if others are interested we have engineers assigned to Pink channel that can make changes. We have been doing that for several months and there have been many changes and tests.
>>221 Yes, that resembled old system. Cannot you lock it with pink about the trouble? I want the system which can work in a click than copy & paste.
Because it was the details about the system, I did not write it here. I did not know that I was shown by the transmission of the image. Because >>216 did not arrive at Jim-san., I used CC.
Because I am going to take a rest from tomorrow, I end the talk.
The megami board has "no redistribution" in local rule. In the deletion about that rule, first picture URL was deleted as the cause of the redistribution along with the deletion of redistributed URL. I think I want to ask you an opinion about whether or not to preserve first picture URL even if there is redistribution's danger.
>>228 I think I made some confusion. Sorry about that. For normal deletion matters, not deleting if you are uncertain. For important deletion matters, please delete if doubtful. 重点削除
One person of Deleter did deletion work. And I think that the work of him/her has a mistake. I want to solve that problem by discussion. That discussion is in progress by the following thread. 運営ボランティアさん指導部屋 3号室 http://pele.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/housekeeping/1274930319/