A turf buttle for diagnostic radiology and interventional radiolody seems to be disadvantageous againt radiologist in Japan. But is it really benefit for patients? Discuss about the subject ,everybody.
Nobody is discussing,disgusting!!! I think that radiologist should do IVR more. It is old fashioned to just sit in front of heaps of films all day.(boring) When you're young, do IVR.(but diagnostic training is necessary) When you get old,do diagnostic radiology.
I agree.From the ecomonical point of view, There is no way except for performing IR. But can refering physician interpret film precisely? I think that they prefer their clinical diagnosis to film interpretaion.Then,obtaining films is meanless. There is some contribution to diagnosis when films are interpreted precisely.
Entstammt dem lateinischen Wort bi = zwei. Unter bisexuellen Menschen versteht man Menschen, die mit beiden Geschlechtern sexuelle oder Liebesbeziehungen eingehen.
>>40 Ascolta, approfondisce e promuove il dibatto 1=Tc culturale attorno alla responsabilità personale e collettiva di fronte al guadagno di un giusto risparmio, alla sua gestione economica ed al suo impiego per lo Tc sviluppo socio ambientale.
Misrepresentation of your age in order to gain access to this sled may be a violation of the law. If you are not 18 years of age or older, you must exit from this site immediately!
>>47 It will have consulted, if my friend wants to become a radiologist. I am opposed to swerving honestly. Although it thinks that radiology is not lost, I can't think that the one side future is bright.
THE ENEMY IS DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY. The above was described by one famous IVRist. I agree! Making a diagnosis without seeing patients appears brack-brained, in general.
To me, but, neither IVR nor diagnostic rad never made any contribution to patients worldwide. If hoping increase confidence of radiologist as a medical stuff in hoppitals everywhere, radiologists and Tc(presenter 1) have to grow out of the radiologic horse sense. Drs,most of fields,think that most of radiologists lag far behind what is considered common sense in medical society.