>>904 Thank you for your post. I appreciate your comment. >>931 There is a solution being worked on. まつ しかない、あめ ふってじ かたまる。 ども ありがとう ひろゆき ★ーさま 乙です 79−さん
If you are going to go to a private hotel room with a prostitute. You should watch your wallet. Girls are evil, and prostitutes are generally basic girl units. Do you leave your wallet on the table? Of course your money will be gone after you take a shower. I don't even think it is stealing. I think you were just very stupid not to watch your wallet. Is this slander if someone writes about it? I am not sure, and need to think on that, but I do know this. It shows how very stupid the customer was to have his money stolen.
>>965 According to procedure, the deletion request of this is carried out formally. However, 79 does not delete and not explain the reason which is not deleted. The person who wrote in is unknown and there is no proof of the fact. This is clear slander and will bring her disadvantageous profit. This should conflict with a deletion guideline clearly. Why doesn't 79 delete this? It is the reason that I want to know. If allowed to say honestly, 79's Japanese is more unclear than English of Jim.
>>966 I agree with the opinion of Jim. But it is not related. It is a problem that the girl is slandered.
>>967 I think this is more like a bad review like a restaurant. If it is deleted then that thread becomes useless. If you have a restaurant, and someone gives you a bad review, then you just need to work harder to get a good review.