I saw(listened) the last day of Berlin Philharmonic Silvester concert on NHK. And I was quite astonished by the performance of Thomas Quasthoff. He gave me a great power to live my life. Thank you, Thomas!
>>945 Yeah, I saw an advert of a weekly tabloid type of magazine on newspaper that touches on some of the featured stories of the magazine. The alleged breakup of KyonKyon and Kamenashi is one of them.
I highly doubt this will make you feel any better but another big couple have emerged. It's Amuro Namie (singer)and Atushi Tamura (comedian). Amuro was a Japan's pop music icon who was extremely popular in 1990's and even after the turn of the century. If you have no clues about how she was popular in her prime, it's easy for you to think she was like a Britney Spears in Japan. They have lots in common, they debuted early, they can dance and they got married with a dancer.
She got devorced with a dancer who is about 15 years older than her 7 years ago. It was a shotgun marrage and she has a kid now. Age gap is something that could be a hurdle to keep marrage going although nobody is certain if it's the reason.
Atsushi Tamura isn't good looking but he's popular with girls because he knows how to please girls and know inside-out how to tickle women's heart. Comedians here are quite popular with girls. Their status in Japanese show business has gone up higher than ever.
Their relationship has just started but media detected their private trip including their friends to Arizona, U.S, on this past New Year's holidays. He responded to media reporters admitting they are in relationship. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOrowf4dHNQ&feature=related
KyonKyon is a shining star and a hope for some middle aged women. Demy Moore is perhaps an equivalent of KyonKyon? She's married with Ashton Cutcher a lot younger than her and very handsome.
any native speaker here? i have some questions about english. whats the difference between↓
baptize and christen ambush and lurk endanger and jeopardize evade and elude baffle and confound delegate and relegate frugal and sparing sear and scorch vile and lousy accommodating and benign adept and proficient arduous and strenuous
I'm so serious, so ardent ,and so desperate about aquiring the speaking skill no inferior to natives, because, in an interview for my next job, I declared that my English skills, especially speaking, are so nice that I can communicate with porple from abroad without any problem.
So, how should I do? The fiest day I work is another 3 weeks ahead. I've got to master speaking by then.
Tell me what to do. I've never been so anxious in my life.
Among four major English skills, 'speaking' is definitely the one I have no confidence in. I appreciate it if anyone could provide me with any information or advice.
>>962 >baptize and christen same thing >ambush and lurk an ambush is when you come out to suprise somebody and normally do something violent to them afterwards. lurking is another word for sneaking i think >endanger and jeopardize endanger is a verb. it means to put something into danger. jeopardise is the same thing but i think you would use endanger for when you mean a living thing and jeopardise for other things >evade and elude they mean the same thing but you would use evade for physically dodging something and elude for saying that you completely don't understand something >baffle and confound same meaning, use confound when you want to sound smart and use baffle for anything else. you can't say "this confounds me" like you can say "this baffles me" though. >delegate and relegate delegate is a person that represents someone else (or a whole group of people). relegate is the opposite of promote >frugal and sparing frugal is more to do with money, while sparing can be used for anything else >sear and scorch sear is burning something by touching it with something very hot, while scorch is without touching. nobody will notice the difference if you get this wrong though (i even had to look this up myself) >vile and lousy vile means disgusting, lousy has the same meaning as useless but it's not as strong >accommodating and benign benign means nice and kind, accomodating probably means that someone is nice enough to let you stay at their home >adept and proficient same >arduous and strenuous same meaning but i guess strenuous can mean more of a mental thing aswell
Benign means harmless, not kind. Accommodating means gracious. Ex.= Linda was a very accommodating host when I stayed at her house over the weekend. Ex. Diane hosts a lovely dinner party! She is so gracious and accommodating. When I spilled wine on my blouse, she loaned me a new one and immediately washed mine. An ex. for the word benign is, "When Laurie found a lump on her breast, She was terrified she might have cancer. Luckily, when she went to the Doctor, he told her the lump was benign." Christian is a description of someone's religious affiliation whereas baptize is what some branches of Christianity do when you become Christian, a ritual. Ex. He was baptized a year ago and is now a very involved Christian. Sometimes I think religion is all he cares about now.
Lastly, concerning the idiom "of one's own accord": If someone does something of his own accord, that means he did it voluntarily, perhaps even without being asked:
>>984 Who are "We"? It's you who asked the question and I know you ask the same question in another thread. It's considered rude to ask the same question in multiple threads.
In the first sentence, the "that" is connected to the "facts". In other words "the facts that we do know" is one noun phrase. So, "that theory accords that we do know with the facts" is incorrect.
Also, note the difference: "That theory accords with the facts that we do know." In other words, "that theory" and "the facts that we do know" agree. "That theory accords what we do know with the facts." In other words, because of "that theory", "what we do know" and "the facts" agree.
"He was able to accord with reality his ideals" is okay, though. In this case, you just changed "he made A and B agree" to "he made B and A agree".
>>987 Thank you for kindness. I didn't care noun phrase yet. I also did not understand it. It is easy to understand as the idea dividing into some phrases.
I also try to learn the relative pronoun too. "That theory accords what we do know with the facts." In this case, Can I change "what" to "that which"? Is "that theory accords that which we do know with the facts" correct?