Hey Native speakers! Come and help us! Part 3
>>700
>Grammatically, the above writing is just below passing. Clarity-wise, it is somewhat muddled and vague.
I kind of addressed this in my other post, but yeah he's just wrong. If he finds that paragraph "muddled and vague", he's not very good at English himself.
>either in grammar or in its thesis.
All I can say to this is, who are you trying to impress? It was just one paragraph written by an ESL guy, and given that, it was damn good.
There's no way this guy (>>695) is evaluating it objectively.
Then to bring in George Orwell? To compare to a paragraph written by a Japanese guy on 2ch? Wow. Douchebag alert.
This guy's just trying to make himself look good, and failing miserably at it.
>Grammatically, the above writing is just below passing. Clarity-wise, it is somewhat muddled and vague.
I kind of addressed this in my other post, but yeah he's just wrong. If he finds that paragraph "muddled and vague", he's not very good at English himself.
>either in grammar or in its thesis.
All I can say to this is, who are you trying to impress? It was just one paragraph written by an ESL guy, and given that, it was damn good.
There's no way this guy (>>695) is evaluating it objectively.
Then to bring in George Orwell? To compare to a paragraph written by a Japanese guy on 2ch? Wow. Douchebag alert.
This guy's just trying to make himself look good, and failing miserably at it.
|
|
|