>>949 http://www.drgrammar.org/faqs/#73 http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/myself.html > It is I or it is me? According to the Merriam Webster's Dictionary of the > English Language,"...instead of the old choice between right and wrong we > are now choosing a style; it is a choice that is much closer to the reality > of usage than the old one was...Clearly, both the it is I and it's me > patterns are in reputable use and have been for a considerable time. It is > I tends to be used in more formal or more stuffy situations; it's me > predominates in real and fictional speech and in a more relaxed writing > style. Him, her, us, and them may be less common after the verb to be than > me is, but they are far from rare and are equally good" (566, 568). = > Patricia O'Conner, author of Woe Is I, says, "It's OK to use It is me, It's > her, and similar constructions, instead of the technically correct but > stuffier It is I, That's he, and It's she.... Unless you're addressing the > Supreme Court or the Philological Society, you can drop the formality (186). By the way.. x yonger o younger
>>943 ...Somehow auto-fellatio sounds horribly boring. I've never really been interested in having sex with myself: I don't feel attracted to myself. But then again I reckon it's good not to be narcissistic, so it's okay :-D And giving oneself a blowjob sounds rather sucky (no pun intended.. okay, so maybe a little), and nor do I have the bendability of a snake, so that in combo with lack of penis ensures that the thought never would cross my mind. Although I lack male genes as well as penis (I'm terribly sorry for dissapointing you) I'm not particularly traditional about/nor keen on gender roles. I say, let people be and behave like whatever they're happy being and behaving (as long as it's not something harmful and makes things better). I'm just glad I wasn't born "the wrong" gender. I've met a few people like that, it's heart-breaking to listen to their stories sometimes. =(
>>944 Yes, quite manly. Especially his muscular build and strength. And he's also girly: I adore his long, angelic hair. It's so pretty and makes him look so cute! x-D I'm glad he decided to let it grow, many years ago xD
>>952 That is something different, k-tan. That is talking about the fact that sentences with linking verbs such as "to be" have a subject and a predicate nominative rather than a subject and direct object like a transitive verb with have.
>>949's issue was whether or not the word "than" can be used as a preposition. Some grammarians say that it is always a conjunction and thus one should always follow it with nouns in the nominative case.
To explain better, they say that "He is taller than her." is wrong because the full sentence would be "He is taller than she is.", and thus the correct short form would be "He is taller than she."
I disagree with that, though. As a native speaker of English, "He is taller than she." sounds wrong to me, and "He is taller than her." sounds natural...
A ten-year old boy in Houston, Texas hung himself in imitation of Saddam Hussein's execution... Isn't it shocking that a ten-year old could do that without anyone's help?
>>954 >"He is taller than she." sounds wrong to me, and "He is taller than her." I think both sound natural, but that's because I'm horribly used to overabbreviated sentences. and thus "He is taller than she." Just makes me think of "He is taller than what she is." and "He is taller than her." makes me think of "He is taller than her height."
Some people try to make grammar prescriptive instead of descriptive. To a certain point it does make sense; if people diverge too much from each other you end up with branches in the language that cannot communicate. However, people also quib over such trivialities as split infinitives, ending a sentence with a preposition, less vs. fewer, and these cases where it does not really matter.
I have been a neet for abour a dozen years! don't continue such worthless question any more! I love child actress. people around me a lolicon which do you love?
>>949 (and to amplify upon >>954 ) In the phrase [foo] is [something] than [bar], [foo] is a subject, and [bar] is an indirect object. So: He is taller than her; she is shorter than him; they are both shorter than me (because I am taller than them.)
You'll occasionally see people using direct objects to be "poetic" or hypercorrective, but they're not technically "correct".
>>994 Grammatically, e.g. "He is shorter than SHE" and "She is taller than I" are correct, because as >>954 mentioned those are the shortened versions of "He is shorter than SHE IS" and "She is taller than I AM." If we take your argument, the original sentences would have to become "He is shorter than HER IS" and "She is taller than ME AM", which are obviously wrong. So in academic papers, for example, you would not want to write "He is shoter than her" or "She is taller than me." However, if you only argue that those grammatically correct usages are not common in our daily conversation, you are right, but please note at the same time that those who use the correct sentences in question are not necessarily being poetic or hypercorrective.