∧_∧ ( ´・ω・) Let's read these books and have a chat. ( つ@O と_)_) A B C D E F
This thread is created for readers of Harry Potter.
Reading English books and exchanging opinions in English will improve your English. So let's get together and have fun talking about the books!
*Before posting, please read the general rule in this thread. There will be spoilers in the thread. And do not forget a [spoiler] tag on it. Maybe something really big at the top with some spaces, like:
= = = = SPOILER! book/movie: [number/name]= = = =
Write the spoiler here.
= = = END SPOILER~! = = =
The couple of spaces in between would let people skip over it if they wanted to
As you know, you can't Apparete in the Hogwarts castle of witch craft and wizardry, but Dobby the house elf and Creature actually Apparated to fulfill the promise they made with Harry Potter. What made them able to Apparate? House elves are allowed to Apparete even in the castle?
This is just my guess, but as Hermione says, you can't Apparete within Hogwarts. The thing is, house elves might be using another skill. I don't know what J.K.Rowling would say, but there must be elves's magic even a wizard can't perform. They are natural, in other words. House elves are not taught curses or charms in school (at least there hasn't been any discription in the books), and still they perform good magics! They can pop in and out anywhere by some skill.
People estimate that R.A.B is Regulus Black. He stole the Horcrux in the cave, you know. And the perchment he left in the fake lockt said he, RAB, would die soon after he broke the Horcrux. I have two questions here. How long ago do you think RAB found it and he only found one Horcrux? Isn't there a possibility he looked for the others? And another question is, is R.A.B already dead? If he's dead, then how can Harry confirm wether he really broke it?
>>7 You don't disagree with you, but I think the author may have made a mistake she herself didn't notice, which she wouldn't admit. House elves obviously Apparate within the Hogwarts castle. That's a mistake.
>>11 I don't think so. All it can do is bite someone. But its teeth must be really sharp and so Harry will take the pain to finish it off with great difficulty.
>>8 To answer your first question, I suppose at least after the first distruction of you know who. Maybe around the time when Crouch's trial took place.
The second question is hard to answer. It's still up in the air whether he's dead or alive.
>>19 No, no, don't get me wrong. I didn't mean to offend you or anything. And I've been talking with you.
I also think Nagini is a special serpent, but it's just a snake. Maybe Voldemort did something to Nagini that could turn it to a more dangerous creature.
Yes, Nagini is terrible. And I'm not sure whether Voldemort did something to the snake. Remember? You know who is a persle tongue, and naturally he can order snakes to do anything as he likes.
I WANT to talk about Harry Potter but you always yell at me to get out. Haha. It's okay lubosuka I still like you. n_n
by the way, I don't think nagini is magical. It doesn't ever really say that she is. If she WAS magical, I think the author would have said something about it. :3
>>30 Good. Yes, Nagini has a piece of Voldemort's soul in its body. Voldemort is the worst wizard ever. That means Nagini is also a terrible snake. And I'm sure a Horcrux is hard to destroy. It cost the right hand of Dumbldore's to break the curse put on a Horcrux. Very magical.
>>35 Still, that doesn't make sense. Voldemort didn't know all of the prophecy. He just went to the Godric Hollow to kill Harry Potter, not to make him a horcrux.
>>31 But Dumbledore said in the book 1 that he didn't want to elliminate the scar that he thinks came in handy. Why is that? If the scar is a Horcrux, what he said doesn't fit.
>>43 You are talking about, of course, the book 5, right? Hmm, no, I'm not either. Sirius Black was really popular among female readers like myself. But the fact that he's not shown up in Harry's 6th year in Hogwarts means he's already....dead.
But I'm sure SB will be mentioned in the book 7. His brother Regulus Black will no doubt appear, that's why.
>>45 Did you really read the book? In the beginning of the book 1, Dumbledore sure said the scar was useful not to Harry Potter himself in person, but to Professor MaCgonagal, who asked him if the scar should be removed. Why? Because Harry was just around a year old then.
>House-elves have a very powerful magic all their own, >magic which requires none of the types of focusing tools >(wands or words) that Wizard magic requires. Dobby used his >magic to enchant a Bludger, to close the magic portal that >leads to Platform Nine-and-Three-Quarters, to interfere >with Owl Post and steal someone's letters, and to knock >Lucius Malfoy down a flight of stairs. He also can >disappear at will, which would seem to be a form of Apparition, >but a form which can be done within Hogwarts, where, >as Hermione constantly reminds Harry and Ron, normal Wizarding >Apparition is simply not possible. All of these are very powerful >charms.
So enslaving House elves makes perfect sense to wizarding communities. If they were enlighten and started to think they should be independent, there would be a riot which wizards can't put down.
>>36 I guess Herry Potter will find something important in Godric Hollow. I don't know, but it may be a clue to a Horcrux and a possession of his father and mother.
>>56 Speaking of house elves, what will happen to giants? In the begining of the book 6, it seems like some giants took the side of Voldemort, and if they are positioned to protect a horcrux, it will be tough for Harry to get through. Grawp and Hagrid (and Madam Maxim) will be needed to face them.
I forgot. What do you think will succeed the postition of the leader of the Order of Phonix in the first place? They will back Harry up, I think, though.
Long time no see! I don't like house elves. I'd prefer Japanese wizards. They are so charming I'm enchanted. Do you think they use some magic to make me love them?
"House-elves are different from wizards; they have their own brand of magic, and the ability to appear and disappear within the castle is necessary to them if they are to go about their work unseen, as house-elves traditionally do."
Personally, I think she really did make a mistake and it just scrambling to make up an excuse for it. ;)
>>65 I'll say, Andrews. I bet she just forgot House elves can pop in and out anywhere in the castle before inventing Apparition. Off the top of my head, Dobby Apparated in the book2 when Harry was kept lying on a bed of the hospital wing. Then we still didn't know about Apparition. I think she didn't think up the magic then.
In the book 1, Quirrel sent a bogus letter to keep Dumbldore away from himself when he tried to gain the philosopher's stone. And if Apparition had been mentioned then, Quirrel's scheme wouldn't have made sense.
>>67 Some people, though very few, still believe Snape is on Harry's side. They say Snape killed Dumbledore for reasons that have a lot to do with protecting Harry.
Lubosuka is right. As a matter of fact, Harry didn't even throw a spell toward Snape in the volume 6 of Harry Potter because of lack of his proficiency of the Occulumency spell. Even if Snape still watches over Harry from the shadow, which I doubt he does, Harry will face Snape as an arch-enemy.
>>65 I found this discription in the book 5, quate, "Harry was sure that the cracking noise had been made by someone Apparating or Disapparating. It was exactly the sound Dobby the house-elf made when he vanished into thin air. Was it possible that Dobby was here in Privet Drive?"
So your guess that J.K.Rowling made an excuse makes sense. She didn't know what she was doing. You can't Apparate in the Hogwarts castle of witch craft and wizardry except for house-elves. That's more precise, I'd say.
>>74 Thank you. I've just skimed the article. So J.K.Rowling didn't plan to let Snape kill the headmaster..
Anyway, what I find interesting is that, to my eye, the more stubarn the auther becames, the more chance Harry got to survive. Rowling seems a bit twisted and difficult. If people begin to think Harry will survive, then she would start implying he won't.
Ah, it's hard for me to express what I have in mind in English...
>>76 I don't mean to push my opinion on you, but as I see it, Snape betrayed Dumbledore's trust. For one thing, he made unbreakable vow which, as I'm sure Snape knew, led to killing the headmaster in the end. For another, when he threw Avada Kedavra curse, we wore a hatred expression on his face. And this may come as a surprise to you, but the author once mentioned Snape was really nasty so she wondered why he got his popularity from her readers... All the evidence showed he's really been a double agent for the Dark Lord, IMO.
Of course, I understand why you think Snape is still on the phenix's side. There's still a mistery of why Dumbledore kept believing in the turncoat. Yes, that'll be answered in book 7, I think.
Have the author said this before ? Sorry I didn't know. Maybe you are right,but what you said have really blown me away.By the way your English is very good and that surprised me too.^^
Whoa. It's popular belief here that: 1.Dumbledore knew he was dying and had Snape "kill" him to protect Malfoy and protect his place as DeathEater. Snape was obligated to protect Draco and finish his assignment if the kid chickened out. So Snape is actually still a loyal spy for the Order. Not that Harry would care. 2. When cleaning out Grimmauld Place, the kids find a locket. Horcrux? 3. RAB is Regulus because...the timeline and everything fits and Rowling loves hiding clues in plain sight. 3. Rowling says a main character will die in the last book but won't say who. What the hell is up with that?
>>87 >Dumbledore knew he was dying and had Snape >"kill" him to protect Malfoy and protect his place as DeathEater Well..? I don't think the silly idea is popular here. No offence.
>>87 That doesn't make sense. Why did Dumbledore try to convince Malfoy not to kill him? The headmaster was really surprised to know Malfoy let death eaters into Hogwarts right under his nose.
To 84. Yeah, I'm still here. Athough I don't always have time to surf the internet, I'm here when I'm on the net.By the way.Why don't get a name?Then,I can recognize you as soon as I come here.
>>96 Like I said, quite I enjoyed the books and the movies, but I wouldn't label myself as a fan. Also, I don't have a lot of free time, and it feels more useful to spend time on for instance spending time with people, whether it be in real life or online, rather than re-reading a book I read not too long ago.
>>96 No, you don't. As for me, however, I've re-read J.K.Rowling because she helps me learn English, in addition to the interesting story I think it's worth spending time with.
>>99 I'm definitely looking forward to it, yeah :-D It will be fascinating to see how the series will end, and how well she'll manage to pull that off.
Growing numbers of people are influenced by Harry Potter. Actually, I'm studying about love potion. When I get the knowledge, I'll concoct one bottle worth of love potion and make one drink it. My friend, on the other hand, does "swish and flick" to move feather up in the air.
>>116 Please don't pull our legs any more. Anyway, I want to read Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows as soon as possible. In case J.K.Rowling surfs the net and find this thread, I'd like to say a thing. "Good luck with book 7!!"
>>119 I don't think so, but you can't rule out the possibility she will search online by "Chat about Harry Potter". If she does, she'll notice people disscuss her books in the thread. By the way, I can't wait for book 7. How about you?
Sorry to butt in, but Harry Potter is obviously a masterpiece. What I'm a little worried about, however, is whether J.K.R could creat more interesting a story than Harry Potter. I wouldn't complain if she didn't, though.
Dumbledore was trying to save Malfoy's soul. After someone kills a person the first time, the second time is easier. Then Malfoy will become a death eater. Dumbledore wanted to give Malfoy a chance to be a good person. He knew that Snape could do what had to be done without losing his chance to be good, but Malfoy probably could not.
Do you have any idea what Dumbledore and Snape had a row about? Snape said Dumbledore took for granted so much he couldn't do it anymore. But what couldn't he do? Any idea?