Emotions ,the complaints or dissatisfaction, etc. are perfectly caused by the fixed ideas of the person who feels them. The stronger attaching to the fixed ideas, the stronger they become. Fixed ideas are, in other words,the individual's clinging idea, bias, stereotype, subjectivity, criterion, preconception, outlook on the world, discernment, creed, thought, philosophy, ideology, principles, pattern of thinking, conviction, and the sense of values such as "This is correct" and "Thus, it should be", etc.,that he unconsciously fixates in his mind. Laughter, impression, and astonishment are caused by the stereotype, too. But the corporal pleasure by feeding, sexual intercourse, etc. and the spinal reflex are out of the questions because the fixed ideas don't act by them directly. Both an infant with an undeveloped ego and an inherent brain injury are also out of the questions because of the same reason.
Everything has no meaning from the first. It is only occured. The meaning and value are caused only after the definition given by each individual aspects and viewpoints of the person who saw them. Information in various forms are originally mere light and shade or the aerial vibration, etc. This sentence you are reading now are just black and white patterns on a paper. You decipher it with a common key of English through a peculiar filter and the biased viewpoint that you have now, and judge the meaning.
It is completely free of the reader to how to analyse and adapt the information . The responsibility to the result belong to the reader even if the ideas and opinions were obtained from someone and receives it because it is chosen by intention without compulsion by someone else For instance, even if you remember how much resenting ,it is a result of your interpretation with your criteria and standard to the last, so that the server of the information has no "cause and responsibility to your resentment" "Compulsion" mentioned here is in a case that including an immediate, physical harm reaches the body. The violent language and the slander are not "Compulsion" at all, except for a big noise. Though a threatening letter , having fear is a selfish effect, and a consequence of reader's deeds.
In short,every person can not (on the net or the TV, etc.) accuse someoneelse for his feelings. The act of the persons who don't notice this "Fight" each other as the mirror mutually and showing contradiction. Even if you feel repulsion for someone, the cause is always not him but "Your stereotype and definition" .It doesn't make any excuse for bullying and its retaliation caused by sauciness and disgust, etc..
To begin with,what you see, what impression you hold, and how to feel it, are individual freedoms. If you give the limitation (For instance, when you press your idea) to someone, immediately you feel the inconvenience (irritation etc.)(If you judge, you are judged) This is a mechanism of this space "You receive what you gave" (Action reaction as said by physics ,or Karma as said by Buddhism).
Vice versa,even if you make someone angry or sorry,there is no necessity that you feel regret and remorse, because his feelings are caused by his ideas and the basis of value of independence
Even if someone tries to make you feel the guilt and inferiority, there is no necessity to afflict youself with the self-dislike in any way because of the above-mentioned. (Of course,this is not a thing that you can make trouble or may not reflect, correct,improve it even if you fail. )
It should not be unexpressed even though the feelings are self-responsibility. Feelings are the way of expression oneself and the chance of inform oneself to others,so it should be expressed on the instance positively. In fact,the person who suppress the feeling tends to explode it,and the person who doesn't want to have responsibility in his feelings wants to limit the others freedom of expression.(not to get wound)
Though many of self-styled intellects are not conscious, "Criticizing" is the evidence that he has only halfway knowledge for the object (Ignorance of ignorance). This is a reason why the criticism become only a temporary, superficial solutions, and it is concealed more and more. In fact, "Criticizing" makes the problem more difficult.
Not only feelings but also everything you experience in the life(external world) is the "Mirror" that projects "What kind of fixed ideas you have (internal world)". Therefore, an emotional criticism is an entire self-contradiction in any case. For instance,the person who criticizes the criminal of cruel villainy, as like "It is unbelievable that there is such inconsiderate man" etc., does not considerate the criminal's standpoint sympathized. Similarly, the hypocrite who wants to come into discriminated question has a deep-rooted discrimination mind. If it is compatible internally, contradiction cannot be seen outside.
The person experiences perfectly as same as the definition what he gave. If he defined "The life does not necessarily become real according to the desire", exactly he experienced "the life that doesn't necessarily become real according to the desire".
Therefore, when you meet the experience that you don't want to repeat, it's good to think "What kind of stereotypes show this experience?" or "Are the stereotypes worth devoting?" If you change the fixed ideas that causes the experiences, you will never go through the similar experience again(if not, you must go through them again.) Ideas occur ahead of experiences,including the idea "Experiences occur ahead of ideas". A present stereotype of the person always defines his past and his environment.
The ideas are made an embodiment in not only the individual but also the group and the society. The idea that the entire group is holding becomes reality and appears as an event that happens in the group. For instance, the poverty is the one that "Fear to hunger" that people have, and the crime actualize "Fear of the loss of the self-existence" .
Everything is done to be inevitable, and to happen and has happened. Coincidence, miracle, fate misfortune, contradiction, irrationality, unjustness, irrationality, etc., are only the concept that used as an excuse for the person who can't understand (explanation) the cause and effect and the necessity of the phenomenon and things. "Darkness" doesn't exist similarly. It is only "the limit of the perception ability. " "Objectivity" doesn't exist similarly neither. It is only the "Shared subjectivity" The truth exist in as many as there are people. "The truth is only one" is mere one of the truth. Therefore, everytime everywhere,the person who is related to "Only one truth" experiences the contradiction through the fight.
Above all are the result of the arbitrary decision that concluded from the narrow view, the prejudice ,and a mere personal subjectivity that was able to be known during his short lifetime. Anyway,you experience as you believe.
yes,i like psychology Is it that difficult? I translated English from Japanese with translating application software at first and get my friend (native) to correct sentences
>>50, Hm, yes, It's a bit difficult. There are very complex words.
But it is an interesting topic. n_n
At birth, people are told what is right and what is wrong, but I think in some cases it can go deeper than that. If a person was taught all their life that treating another type of person was bad, eventually one person would realize in their heart that this way of thinking is wrong. At least that is what I believe.