【onishi】日立製作所の裏事情70.11【ドイツ永住】
860 ：hidenobu onishi 忍法帖【Lv=40,xxxPT】(2+0：5) ：
Hi,
Today I went your office and wrote two papers.
Fortunately, I could make a copy of some materials, so I bring them tomorrow.
I think Japanese big problem is, Government tells people something wrong intentionally.
For my case, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry person said to me, Personal Information Protection Law is a company - to - consumer's law.
But I don't think so, because that law is taken after the OECD’s Eight Principles.
http://oecdprivacy.org/
The OECD’s Eight Principles doesn't mention about the organization which uses Personal Informations.
But Japanese law mention about that, as "third party".
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?ft=1&re=02&dn=1&x=50&y=21&co=01&ky=個人情報の保護に関する法律&page=4
From the point of the OECD’s Eight Principles, "third party" should be a person who is not allowed to see or use the Personal Informations.
But, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry person said, "third party" means other company,
so your case is your company, as "second party", so that is not a illegal case.
But it is not true, for Hitachi hires 30,000 people, so if that is true, all people can see all of their Personal Informations.
That is quite nonsense!
Today I went your office and wrote two papers.
Fortunately, I could make a copy of some materials, so I bring them tomorrow.
I think Japanese big problem is, Government tells people something wrong intentionally.
For my case, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry person said to me, Personal Information Protection Law is a company - to - consumer's law.
But I don't think so, because that law is taken after the OECD’s Eight Principles.
http://oecdprivacy.org/
The OECD’s Eight Principles doesn't mention about the organization which uses Personal Informations.
But Japanese law mention about that, as "third party".
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?ft=1&re=02&dn=1&x=50&y=21&co=01&ky=個人情報の保護に関する法律&page=4
From the point of the OECD’s Eight Principles, "third party" should be a person who is not allowed to see or use the Personal Informations.
But, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry person said, "third party" means other company,
so your case is your company, as "second party", so that is not a illegal case.
But it is not true, for Hitachi hires 30,000 people, so if that is true, all people can see all of their Personal Informations.
That is quite nonsense!
|
|
|
861 ：hidenobu onishi 忍法帖【Lv=40,xxxPT】(2+0：5) ：2012/11/20(火) 06:58:32.01 ID:8GLgCENM0
And my case, Hitachi's person collect my mails and made a new materials which punish me.
I never allowed about that.
That is quite illegal case.
http://www.hitachi.com/about/corporate/organization/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2012/09/24/121001_e.pdf
I was in Rail Systems Company, Infrastructure Systems Group.
And my claim mails about intranet were collected and made materials and sent to my boss from Corporate Information Technology Group.
They say that was a employment management information, but I can't think Corporate Information Technology Group person has such permission to Rail Systems Company, Infrastructure Systems Group.
Best regards,
Hidenobu ONISHI
I never allowed about that.
That is quite illegal case.
http://www.hitachi.com/about/corporate/organization/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2012/09/24/121001_e.pdf
I was in Rail Systems Company, Infrastructure Systems Group.
And my claim mails about intranet were collected and made materials and sent to my boss from Corporate Information Technology Group.
They say that was a employment management information, but I can't think Corporate Information Technology Group person has such permission to Rail Systems Company, Infrastructure Systems Group.
Best regards,
Hidenobu ONISHI