At present sovereign nations, that be realized each, organize our International Social. Our International Social is plural and various. At Sinocentrism the world is unified. China possess the highest authority of the world of Sinocentrism. In this idea, the hegemonism of china do not have geographical limit. U.S.A. or E.U feel a little menace because of the great distance from china or the military balance. Please understand that Sinocentrism is dangerous rather Islamic fundamentalism.
The Tang dynasty or the Sung dynasty contained not only chinese race but also another races. But, another races recognized as savage tribes. For example, Chinese dynasty recognized Korean dynasty as a lower legitimately dynasty. The Juche(independence) idea of N.Korea contains the wish for independence from Sinocentrism. Qing dynasty regarded the Queen of Britain as a chieftain of the savage tribes. These facts suggest that the world is unified and the hegemonism of china do not have geographical limit at Sinocentrism. Sinocentrism inconsistent against our International Social.
This dangerous thoughts established because of heavy damage of civil wars. They wished to have a unified dynasty earnestly.
It is desirable that China stays our plural and various International Social without Sinocentrism. Reflection of ideal change, only one china have to be present sovereign nations. After that, Chinese may go well.